Sanity-Sux @bootneck

Labour rushes through mayoral voting changes to block Reform There’s never been such a morally corrupt Government as this one. Labour tried to postpone local elections to avoid losing. Now they are fiddling the voting system in Manchester. Shameful telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…

🚨JESS PHILLIPS - NAMED AND SHAMED - INSIDE RAPE GANG INQUIRY REPORT The inquiry makes clear: Jess Phillips maintained a PUBLIC SILENCE on the ethnic and religious patterns of the gangs while girls in her constituency suffered. "Evidence shows Labour politicians prioritised avoiding ‘far-right empowerment’ narratives and ensuring so-called “community relations” over protecting victims." 'Jess Phillips, appointed Safeguarding Minister, had much to do with his show of contempt by the Labour Party. Survivors resigned from her victim panel in disgust, condemning the process as a sham. Phillips apologised for delays, but retained the full backing of Sir Keir Starmer. Under her watch, ethnicity recording remains patchy and the anti-white aspect of these horrendous crimes continues to be downplayed'

I'm a competent parent. There is absolutely nothing in my family's life that can be, or has been, improved by Liz Kendall I wouldn't trust her to eat with a fork.

Liz Kendall @leicesterliz

2 days ago

Parents have been crying out for support when it comes to their children being on social media. So that’s why we’ve made this big decision – to put power back in to parents’ hands, and to give children their childhood back.

2K 69 197 226K 43

Join over 50,000 people in signing the FSU petition to SAVE JURY TRIALS. If David Lammy gets his way, more people will be banged up for simply expressing their right to free speech. ✍️ Sign below 👇

When Labour MPs like @labourlewis & Lib Dem’s like @EdwardJDavey say trans women (males) are no danger to women in changing rooms & bathrooms they always conveniently forget about the 60% plus of those males already in prison who ID as women, in for sexual assault against …Women!

Emily Wilding Davison🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Wommando

3 days ago

➡️Two men pretending to be women both jailed for sex crimes on the same day in UK. One for n0ncery. One for m@sturbating in front of nurses. And that was just Monday! It's almost like these men are just raging perverts isn't it. But OF COURSE it NEVER HAPPENS! This is trans.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

89 1K 3K 89K 210

The Mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan, continues to call for greater intervention and regulation of social media platforms that highlight rising crime in the capital. Khan has claimed that London has been subjected to a “relentless and unprecedented attack of lies and hatred” on social media. He now argues that online “misinformation” is deterring tourists from visiting the city. Yet Home Office data show that there were nearly 100,000 thefts or attempted thefts in London last year, compared with around 45,000 in 2019. Rather than trying to shut down criticism and debate, or blaming social media for London’s problems, the Mayor should focus on tackling rising crime and making the case for his own policies. More open discussion is not the problem. It is part of the solution.

UK Police Officer Threatens a Man With Section 35 But Can’t Explain What Section 35 Is 🤦‍♂️ Officer: “It’s under Section 35 Act.” Man: “Section 35 of what?” Officer: “It doesn’t matter what.” Unbelievable. When calmly asked to specify the law behind her threat, she clearly didn’t know and got defensive instead of professional. Of course it matters what power you’re threatening arrest under. Officers should know the basics of the laws they quote, not brush it off like it’s irrelevant.

It's like banning telephones. This is insane levels of state control By a demonstrably incompetent and nasty state.

Sophy Ridge @SophyRidgeSky

3 days ago

🚨 Liz Kendall tells me BlueSky WILL be banned for under 16s as it falls under definition of social media website

279 69 188 125K 55

Nobody voted for this. Normalising facial recognition, surveillance and zero privacy for the next generation. I hate this government (and the last) for their weakness in buying all of these controlling measures, sold to them by vested interests @UN & @wef under the guise of "keeping kids safe. " A chosen few will make perverse amounts of profit during this process. But what can you do...? They have weaponised our children to turn against their parents. And @Keir_Starmer couldn't care less. It really is that serious. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…

Don’t let free speech be the victim of the Belfast riots, writes Hugo Timms. This Labour Government has once again jumped at the opportunity to use civil unrest to clamp down on social media. In a fractured governing party, they are united by a belief that problems can be solved by controlling what people say — increasingly online. In the aftermath of the first night of rioting in Belfast — after a Sudanese immigrant attempted to behead an innocent man in the street — Technology Secretary Liz Kendall took to X and said: “Those who use social media to incite violence and disorder are breaking the law. Next week we will lay before Parliament an update to the Online Safety Act requiring services to take quicker action to remove illegal content circulating during times of crisis.” She added: “I have explicitly asked Ofcom to discuss urgently with X and other platforms how they will comply with the Online Safety Act.” Following the Southport riots in 2024, Starmer’s Government launched a fierce assault on free speech, with many individuals convicted for statements made online being treated more harshly than the rioters themselves. This Government has used the Orwellian Online Safety Act as a tool to suppress free speech. Read more below in @spikedonline 👇

Sixteen Year Olds Get the Vote. They Do Not Get X. Today Keir Starmer announced a ban on under-16s using ten social media platforms. TikTok, Instagram, Threads, Facebook, X, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, Twitch and Kick. Bluesky is not on the list. Neither is Discord. This matters because of what we know about both platforms, and because of what Australia did about one of them. Bluesky has publicly acknowledged a "predictable uptick" in child sexual abuse material as its user base grew, serious enough that it partnered with the Internet Watch Foundation to deal with it. Discord was the subject of an NBC News investigation that found hundreds of active servers being used to groom and exploit children, a finding its own chief executive called "horrifying." The Australian government, the model Britain says it is following, agreed with that assessment of Bluesky. It was added to the restricted list there in November 2025, with the same minimum age of 16 that applies to the rest of the ban. The UK's preliminary list does not include it. This is not a case of Britain simply replicating that approach. The policy has been described as "Australian-style" and "Australia-plus," going further on curfews and chatbot restrictions than the original. On the one platform with a documented child safety problem that the original restricted, Britain has chosen to diverge. That is not an oversight in a policy carefully benchmarked against another country's model. It is a choice. X, meanwhile, made the list. The government itself uses X. So do the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats and Your Party. None of them are leaving the platform, yet figures from all four have called for tighter restrictions on it or for it to be banned outright. What changed is not who uses the platform but what gets said there and who says it. Footage of the Belfast stabbing first spread on X to millions of people within an hour of it happening. The government's record on immigration, asylum and policing is challenged there daily, by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky, by contrast, has become known as a space where that kind of challenge is rare. The platforms are not being separated by risk to children. They are being separated by how comfortable the political class is with what gets said on each. A government can claim this is coincidence once. The pattern across this entire policy says otherwise. Yesterday it emerged the announcement had been brought forward by weeks. Ian Russell, Molly Russell's own father, could identify no reason for that beyond the Makerfield by-election. Today it emerges the platform list does not track the evidence of harm, even when that evidence comes from the government's own template. Reem Ibrahim of the Reason Foundation has already asked the obvious question. Is this overt political censorship. Sources tell the Guardian the government may face judicial review over precisely this inconsistency. Then there is the contradiction nobody in government has addressed. Starmer has discussed extending the vote to sixteen and seventeen year olds, on the basis that they are mature enough to weigh arguments and choose a government. The logic of this ban is that the same sixteen year olds cannot be trusted to read X without the state intervening on their behalf. A government that believes both of these things at once does not have a coherent theory of childhood. It has a theory of which platforms it would prefer young voters not to encounter before an election. The timing was political. The platform list, sparing on its own template's terms the platform that most deserved scrutiny, is harder still to explain. This was never only about Molly Russell and child safety. It is about who gets to talk to whom, and when, in the run-up to an election this government is increasingly afraid of losing. "Bluesky has publicly acknowledged a "predictable uptick" in child sexual abuse material as its user base grew"

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

It's great that the ban on Palestine Action has been upheld, but this question should never have been decided by judges in the first place. Parliament makes the law. It voted to ban Palestine Action. It's for the British people to hold Parliament accountable, not judges.

BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking

3 days ago

UK government's ban on Palestine Action is lawful, Court of Appeal says, overturning earlier ruling bbc.in/4uMempi

300 240 2K 402K 74

Yes

Hope X @Xmusknewsx

5 days ago

Do you Agree with Sarah Pochin that Sharia Courts have NO place in Britain. 🅱️.YES 🅰️.NO

598 368 2K 346K 9

So let me get this straight: Leftists want 16 year olds to vote. They want 12 year olds to be able to consent to sex changes. But they don’t want those same teenagers to read conservative opinions on social media, only Blue Sky? Their agenda is pretty obvious.

Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat

4 days ago

🚨BREAKING: Bluesky will NOT be blocked for under 16’s as part of UK government’s social media ban

1K 1K 10K 1.5M 644

This is absolutely horrendous. These people need to face the full force of the law.

Young Bob @YoungBobRB

3 days ago

Someone has submitted footage of what happened. Look at how a gang of foreigners just randomly begin hitting and punching me. This was the first incident. After that, I tried to retrieve my things, and they tried to attack me a second time. Then the police arrived.

4K 6K 31K 6.7M 3K

According to this Labour Government 16 and 17 year olds are mature enough to vote, but not to serve on a jury. That is an "adult duty" apparently. They are old enough to vote, but are now subject to a government-mandated social media curfew at 8.30pm. The only consistent thing about Labour's votes at 16 policy is the blatant party political self interest.

Labour must go as soon as possible

Alpha Wolf 🐺 @Crazyunfill94

5 days ago

In Manchester, England, Muslims were loudly blasting the Quran on loudspeakers. A British woman stepped up and said, “This is England, a Christian country! I don’t want to hear the Quran!” For just saying that, the police arrested her on charges of causing a public order

442 2K 6K 565K 311

Angela Eagle. 34 years of being wrong. 34 years of voting for every open-border policy, every EU power grab, every failed immigration scheme. She watched record boat arrivals on her watch and called it 'complexity.' She scrapped the Rwanda deterrent and replaced it with... nothing. She has never had an independent thought in 450 parliamentary votes. Not one rebellion. Not one principle she wouldn't sell for a promotion. And now she's Security Minister. The woman who couldn't secure a border is securing the entire realm. The woman who never stood up to her party is standing up to terrorists. The woman who failed at every metric is measuring success for the rest of us. This isn't government. This is jobs for the girls/boys who never questioned the boys/girls. 34 years of failure, rewarded with a Damehood and a promotion. Angela Eagle isn't a security expert. She's a careerist who secured the only thing that matters to her: her own advancement.

Home Office @ukhomeoffice

5 days ago

Welcome to the Home Office @angelaeagle.

2K 117 615 534K 33

What a disgraceful tweet from anyone let alone the Leader of a British Political party. They should have got much longer in my view. Attacking a police officer is totally abhorrent as a starter!

Zack Polanski @ZackPolanski

6 days ago

Gut wrenching to see four young people jailed for direct action against an arms supplier to Israel. Years in prison for protesting to save lives in Gaza, with 'terrorism' used despite no jury convicting them of it. A truly dangerous attack on the right to protest.

10K 7K 28K 6.9M 1K

The man who wants to ban social media for spreading misinformation @Keir_Starmer has been community noted 27 times for lying.