Straker Optimized @Anglonaut

NEW: The White House has created a UAP Governance Board, which oversees the @ProfAviLoeb Advisory Council. @ODNIgov says the Board will "integrate" & "optimise" the investigation of UAP incidents and assist in timely coordination of declassification. There is nothing in this statement that says this Board - or Prof Loeb's Advisory Council - will be given legal powers - such as subpoena - to enforce these aspirations. It's still @DeptofWar deciding what they get to see. Both the Governance Board and Advisory Committee are to be in support of @AARO, the Pentagon's UAP investigation office, so this new structure is all under @DeptofWar & IC control. Unless these bodies are given teeth, it means the gatekeepers retain control over disclosure. Unless the @WhiteHouse @POTUS gives a UAP transparency oversight body independence and teeth, so-called Disclosure will be ineffectual and evasive for as long as the gatekeepers want to conceal. This risks being yet another ineffectual effort like Project Bluebook, humouring public demands for truth but continuing the cover-up. Credit: @ddeanjohnson

D. Dean Johnson @ddeanjohnson

11 hours ago

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ODNI) REVEALS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF "UAP GOVERNANCE BOARD" In response to my inquiries, an official of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) gave me the statement shown below today (June 16, 2026, 11:45 AM

19 45 166 43K 46

@StevenCambian @MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @grok put on your lawyer's hat. Did he say that?

@MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @StevenCambian "He would have, he could have ..he should have said!" You're desperately seeking a narrative that can't be sustained by a congressional transcript that doesn't suit your argument. And you'll continue circulating the lie that Grusch said: "aliens are killing people!".

@MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @StevenCambian It is not the same. Truth is, you don't know what Grusch meant because he intentionally omitted specifics. People who testify in legal forums use evasive language all the time precisely so assumptions made by people like yourself can be refuted.

@MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @StevenCambian Are you changing the subject now? "there were malevolent events like that" ..means nothing Obviously you never went to law school or you'd realize that this is not confirmation that anyone actually died.

@MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @StevenCambian This is all bullshît and conjecture you're posting, Charlie. He's speaking broadly with intention to avoid disclosing whether witnesses in context were harmed, killed or none of the above. IOW you have no idea what you're talking about.

@MrHustleMCR @SicCoP1 @StevenCambian >Grusch...says aliens are killing humans This is a pretty egregious misquotation. You're taking liberties with what he said (and didn't say) during his testimony to the Oversight Committee.

@Only_Ryan02 @ChrisUKSharp Membership of the interagency UAP Governance Board has not been publicly released and likely won't be any time soon.

This is quite a demotion from what panelists had access to back in 1953. Even USAF and CIA granted members limited access to classified data for scientific review.

Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger

8 hours ago

.@ProfAviLoeb just confirmed to me by phone that his UAP advisory board will not have access to any classified information and has no legal authority.

123 100 538 143K 46

@ChrisUKSharp The advisory council has nothing to discuss. We may as well be back in 1953 with Luis Alvarez and Thornton Page mulling over radar data and indistinct photography provided to panel members by the Air Force.

@PCAnderson3999 @jamescfox Russia

@RedPandaKoala There are reams of pushback and circuitous logic in those mentions trying to justify why it's somehow more productive to insist on telemetry and sensor data from satellites when a gatekeeper offers you the keys to the saucer.

Mr. Mellon, While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet... You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples. The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release. This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs. Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered. So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?.... You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials." newsnationnow.com/cuomo-show/ufo… This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics. At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking. Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data? An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here: x.com/UAPGERB/status… Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?

Christopher K. Mellon @ChrisKMellon

2 days ago

The other day I was asked by an Administration official what my priorities would be for release of UAP information. I replied as follows: 1) UAP Space Data UAP detected in space, either in orbit or entering and departing the Earth’s atmosphere. I believe we have such data yet

172 278 1K 177K 187

@UAPReportingCnt Intel operatives have marked her as a vector to distribute passage material for decades. Her Antarctica military sources relayed some looney tales reminiscent of SSP/Solar Warden.

@drue86 @zerohedge It did quite well at the box office. x.com/i/trending/206…

The fact the Sullivan has neither a documented nor a rumored history of drug abuse [via family or coworkers] elevates justification for an official investigation. No prior overdoses No addiction treatment or rehab No recreational drug use No legal issues related to substances No pattern of misuse before May 2024

@Docneuroeo @ericweinstein Weinstein seems like an obvious pick since publicly admitting that he's confounded by both the phenomenon itself and associated legacy programs controlling it. @robinhanson would also be a good choice.

@TomMontalk @PostDisclosure I have more questions about this which are probably best saved for another time. Interesting perspectives, and thanks for sharing, Tom.

My background is empirical so forgive the ignorance concerning exo-theology but it seems like #2 is more consistent with the laws of thermodynamics as manipulating an existing substrate rather than an ex nihilo style of monotheistic creationism. If this is true, what happens when a more advanced race of trans-galactic beings asks the question: "What preceded the singularity?"

@TomMontalk @PostDisclosure Right, I was referring to the definition that ascribes divinity to the cosmos or an overlap with Pantheism. This claim in context to ETs originated with members of The Aviary.