Meka Asonye @BigMekaStyle

@neelkunjur @K2SpaceCo Just the beginning!

It’s official: K2 Space is operating the most powerful Hall thrusters currently flying in space. Just a few weeks after the launch of our first test mission, Gravitas, we’ve successfully fired both of our 20kW Hall thruster systems to achieve a new level of electric propulsion power never before seen on orbit for this type of system. We plan to continue raising and lowering our orbit as we gather more data on the thruster performance while continuing our mission in LEO. This milestone is yet another validation of K2’s approach to building bigger, as more powerful thrusters will enable the MEO, GEO, and deep space missions of the future.

@suzannexie 🇺🇸

I'm very proud to share that the team @K2SpaceCo has achieved Tier 2 Mission Success for Gravitas! Over the past week, we've: • Powered on our payloads • Activated our high power propulsion system and fired the thruster • Completed testing of our software system, including a software update With all of the satellite bus systems demonstrated and checked out, we will be transitioning to sustaining operations for the rest of the mission. This includes continuing our payload demonstrations while pushing the satellite bus systems to the limit to learn as much as possible for future missions. (And yes, this photo is real. Our thruster firing on orbit.) ---

Solid-state batteries are changing naval warfare. And the threats they enable are far harder to detect. A post recently went viral claiming Iran's "Azhdar" UUV patrols at 18–25 knots with 4-day endurance and 600+ km range. This appears to be false, but the post went viral because the narrative is true. UUVs are a growing threat and maritime, as demonstrated by this crisis, is more important than ever. And the stakes are high. Iran has long held the Strait of Hormuz as a pressure point; roughly 20% of global oil supply flows through a 21-mile-wide chokepoint. UUVs capable of covertly laying mines in those waters would further threaten naval assets and escalate the conflict. UUVs are already being deployed by multiple nations. Today's lithium-powered vehicles cover hundreds of kilometers and patrol for days. Solid-state batteries at 400 Wh/kg, and climbing, mean that gets dramatically better, cheaper, and more scalable this decade. Sensing underwater is categorically harder than any other domain. cUAS has radars, cameras, RF, microwave. The electromagnetic spectrum works for you in air. Water kills RF. Acoustics are the primary detection modality, and littoral environments add clutter and complexity that open-ocean legacy systems were never built for. Those legacy systems were designed to find large submarines in deep water. Not swarms of small autonomous vehicles near ports, chokepoints, and critical infrastructure. As UUVs get cheaper, faster, and more autonomous - sensing is the defining gap. cUUV is going to be a massive market. Interdiction starts with detection. And detection underwater is still largely unsolved.

Depending on which viral AI essay you agreed with on X this week, it’s already so over or we’re all playing a very expensive game of Farmville. As with most things, the real answer is a lot more unsatisfying. It’s all still messy and probably lies somewhere in the middle. While it does feel like things are shifting extremely quickly in a way that’s hard to dismiss, the hype is escalating every day. It’s impossible to tell where exactly we are on the curve. What has been more interesting to me than the debate over which camp folks are in is just how much traction these pieces are getting. I think we’re all kind of desperate to make sense of how uneven things are, and are all caught up in this moment of trying to process the whiplash. You’ll be scrolling through crazy OpenClaw workflows and mishaps that truly feel like scenes out of the future, but then skepticism starts to creep in about what’s true and what’s overengineered. And then anytime you step outside the tech bubble you can get an instant reality check on how much wood there still is to chop to get to widespread adoption. (Even if it’s just seeing how differently the ChatGPT vs. Anthropic vs. Google Super Bowl AI ads landed for tech folks vs. normies.) The gap between what people are posting about and what’s actually making a difference has never felt harder to figure out. The main thing I’ve found to be helpful as a counterweight is trying to stay diligent on spending my time as an investor where I think it matters most vs. getting caught up in the wild swings. For the past few years now, that’s meant meeting with builders who are focused on solving hard, real-world problems. To me that means taking on the biggest, most technically and operationally challenging issues in the physical world (aerospace, defense, robotics), or figuring out how to usefully inject AI into the painful, manual workflows in industries that actually make and move things. Not only because this is what personally gets me more fired up but also because it feels like this is the general direction our world is headed in. More and more of the founders I’m meeting are reorienting their approach to problem hunting and building in this way. @DideroAI is a great example here and is top of mind because they just shared their $30M Series A news today from @chemistry and @HeadlineVC. They found a problem space most of us know virtually nothing about. Procurement teams at manufacturers and distributors are managing thousands of supplier interactions across email, spreadsheets and ERPs. The bulk of this stuff is still done manually, even though it’s only getting more and more complicated as companies try to diversify their supply chains across more countries. When I led their seed in 2024, @tspencer15, @tcpetit, and @LPallhuber immediately felt like a team that was well-configured to the shape of the challenge here. They’ve been those people stuck in the mud of these workflows. (Between the 3 of them they’ve built companies, run procurement operations across countries, and dealt with the pain of trying to coordinate 100s of suppliers.) Spaces like these, where the team has the deep domain context and the agents are correctly applied, are where AI can and already is making a near-term, not-theoretical difference. In took less than a couple years, and Didero’s agents are now doing things like following up on 2K+ past due order line items that were sitting neglected, automating PO creation, and pulling info off physical bills of lading and getting it into the ERP so production doesn’t stall out waiting on someone to manually type it in. None of those are paradigm-shifting on their own, but stack up these small, boring, concrete wins week after week, company to company (and assume they continue to improve in capability at an explosive rate), and pretty soon we’ll all be surprised by just how much wood has been chopped.

@jakobdiepen I'm ready to run through a brick wall.

Working at @stripe with Jeanne was one of the highlights of my professional career. So fun to see it come full circle as she drops truth bombs on the @firstround pod

Brett Berson @brettberson

4 months ago

Today we’re launching our newest podcast, Executive Function. The question we’re trying to answer is: what is the difference between good and truly great scale up executives? We’re beginning this journey by sitting down with Jeanne DeWitt Grosser, who’s currently the COO @vercel

2 7 38 25K 31

As the founder of a space company, I like to think I’m pretty optimistic - but even I underestimated the rate of acceleration we’ve seen over the last few months. Almost four years ago, Neel and I started a company because we were excited about Starship. We saw the opportunity to build much bigger, much higher power satellites that could start humanity down the path towards being a Type 2 Kardashev civilization. We decided to call the company K2, we made our logo a Dyson sphere. Four years later, the Kardashev scale is a mainstream concept - with the ambition to make humanity a K2 civilization being broadcast by one of the greatest engineers in the world. Concepts that I thought were 5 to 10 years out, like orbital data centers - are now foundational capabilities for what could be one of the most significant IPOs ever. We’ve gone from people asking us “why would anyone need a 100kW satellite?” to people taking that number, asking their AI to put it into their orbital data center excel and having the lightbulbs go off. It’s honestly the best time ever to be building in space, we are truly fortunate to be building K2 today. For a big satellite company, we’re a small fish in a big big pond. We may end up being NPCs in a much bigger game - time will tell. All I know is I’m going to have the time of my life building alongside people I admire and respect. So up next, launching the 20kW satellite in two months, learning a ton, continuing designs on the 100kW satellite, scaling up the factory and doing our small part to help progress humanity up the curve. “K2 or you’re not even trying.”

Happy last closing day of the Fiscal Year SaaS sellers (to those who celebrate)! Good luck getting those commits across the finish line.

I've recently seen one too many examples where VCs forget that we WORK for the founders, not the other way around. We are in a client services business. Your reputation is all you have. One damning founder reference could kill your career. 👀

Come work with one of the best in the biz!

Josh Kopelman @joshk

5 months ago

In 20+ years of building @firstround, I’ve never hired for this specific role before. I’m kicking off a search to hire an Investor who will work directly alongside me. They will share my obsession to meet with the highest potential founders as early as possible, often before

38 37 419 113K 306

Once in a while, it is important to take a step back and appreciate how ridiculous life sometimes is. Seeing K2 show up in Times Square is one of those moments. A big thanks to @Nasdaq and everyone who else who supported us @K2SpaceCo over the last week - the feedback has been incredible. Now, back to work.

Three and a half years ago, @neelkunjur and I decided to go from being Brothers, to being Co-Founders. Today, we’re excited to announce that @K2SpaceCo has raised a $250M Series C at a $3B valuation. This round comes on the heels of $500M in signed contracts across commercial and US Government customers. Our Series C is being led by @Redpoint, with participation from @TRowePrice, Hedosophia, @AltimeterCap, @lightspeedvp, Alpine Space Ventures and many others. We’re fortunate to be building at a unique time - launch vehicles are getting larger and the frequency of launch is increasing. When it comes to satellites, it’s now possible to Build Bigger, and we intend to be on the vanguard of doing just that. Building Bigger allows us to deliver a step change in power (20kW today, 100kW tomorrow), reliability, and redundancy. Our satellites are designed to deliver the maximum amount of capability wherever that capability is needed (LEO, MEO, GEO, cislunar space and beyond). Coming up next - 20kW satellite launch early 2026, three satellites launched early 2027, and many more to come after that as we scale up production in our 180k sq ft factory in Torrance, CA. We’re looking forward to sharing more on our progress over the coming months and years. -

forbes.com/sites/aliciapa…

Three years ago, @KaranKunjur and @NeelKunjur pitched me on the idea of building bigger. Today, @k2spaceco has a new $3B valuation (with a $250M Series C round), a business that’s humming (with over $500M in contracts this year), a huge factory where 80% of each satellite is built in-house (right here in the USA), and a massive upcoming Gravitas launch (T-080d as the countdown clock on their slick new website shows). Couldn’t be more proud of all that this team pulled off in 2025. One of the highlights of my year was going down in person to watch the launch of their first mission flying hardware on SpaceX's Transporter-12. 2026 is going to be even bigger. LFG. 🚀 Great write up on all their progress today in Forbes below.

@KaranKunjur @neelkunjur @K2SpaceCo LFG! Excited to see what ya’ll do in the next chapter. 🚀

Results are in: • @varadh - angel investor • @cyantist - Long Journey • @vsodera - Supercharge • @DStrachman - 1517 • @alanaagoyal - basecase • @edsim, @etdurbin - Boldstart • @darian314, @brackin, @thezbg - Gradient • @jsngr - lil fund • @MaxClaussen - SystemOne VC • @jackmcclelland - Aforevc • @yoheinakajima - Untapped VC • @BigMekaStyle - First Round • @AmberIllig - The Council Cap • @mashadrokova - DayOne VC • @lessin, @yrechtman - Slow • @taylor_w_c - Abstraction Capital • @jefielding - Everywhere VC • @TurnerNovak - Banana Capital • @calfonsorico - Cocoa VC • @erica_wenger - Park Rangers Cap • @andreasklinger - Prototype Cap • @AstasiaMyers - Felicis • @bryce - Indie VC • @Markgher - MXV Capital • @vedikaja_in - Weekend Fund • @sarahcat21 - Amplify • @hunterwalk - Homebrew • @KatieS - Moxxie Ventures • @kartiktalwar GP - a_capital • @stevenl - SevenStars VC • @reedmcbride - angel investor • @S27G_ - angel investor • @yanabana - angel investor • @evancharles - angel investor • @NealMintz1 - Wischoff VC • @vaibhavbetter - Better Capital • @mmccauley - Garage Capital • @pgillian____ - Village Global • @soleio - angel investor • @ColinGardiner - Yonder Ventures • @SVenkatachalam - Axiom • @tgm - angel investor • @JamesTamplin - HF0 • @ashleymayer - Coalition VC • @sonyatweetybird - Sequoia • @JamesBorow - angel investor

Ben Lang @benln

7 months ago

Who are the pre-seed / seed investors every founder should want on their cap table these days?

229 28 773 361K 1K

What does it take to build not one, but multiple multibillion-dollar enterprise companies? @jyotibansalsf has some of the clearest answers, starting with the foundation of any startup: product-market fit: “My definition of product-market fit isn’t about whether we’ve sold the product. It’s about whether we’ve delivered the value we promised after the sale. For most enterprise software products, I’ve found a useful rule of thumb: if you’ve truly delivered value to 25 customers, you have strong product-market fit. Not just sold to 25 customers, but delivered on the results you promised. When you made the sale, you said, ‘Here’s the problem we’ll solve and the ROI you’ll get.’ Three or six months later, if those customers have actually realized that ROI and your product has been successfully implemented, that’s real product-market fit.” In our conversation, we explore nearly every aspect of going from zero to one in the enterprise, from hiring your first salesperson to expanding into multiple products.