Clare Page : No Secret Lessons @NoSecretLessons

@LadySoLucky @MrMennoTweets @vfxx555 @forevershallon @ISBI3 @AlessandraAster @ThePosieParker Well the silence from the couch was deafening.

Oh give me strength… 🤦‍♀️ Apparently we now have to sue our way back to free speech through small claims, like we’ve been mis-sold car finance. I just don’t even know where to start.

Sex Matters @SexMattersOrg

2 weeks ago

Refused service in a pub, barred from a gym or forced to leave an event because of your gender-critical views? We have published a guide on how to take a “small claim” for belief discrimination against a service provider. Watch @MForstater and @HJoyceGender discuss the process

145 1K 3K 205K 561

@ndzionist081945 @MrMennoTweets And convention. A constitution is there even if it’s unwritten.

@I_Am_Victim Good point.

Expect more secret Netflix lessons in British schools folks, on emasculating gender spectrums, critical race theory, veganism, the joys of anal sex, climate catastrophes, our evil colonial past, toxic masculinity, British rape culture and how to self flagellate your straight, white privilege into apathetic compliance… this one is going to need it turned up to 11 to keep the country on its ‘multicultural’ tracks.

Kellie-Jay Keen @ThePosieParker

2 days ago

Whatever you do, do not notice.

72 217 2K 19K 10

@I_Am_Victim If he survives. And yes, remarkable degrees of narrative control are taking place.

@JocastaMoney @UtopiaIsALie Abstract civil rights will do that to you. You have to stay real.

This is an important division here. Anyone who wants to understand the rift between the dominant, liberal LGB-GC women’s rights activists and those labelled ‘ultra’ who are skeptical of their work (which includes me!), you need to research this area. Crucially, Bev is mistaken in the two causes she mentions for the sadistic exploitation of the gender industry - she forgets a third *and the most significant* of the motivations; sexual perversion and predation - especially involving a range of fetishes and paraphilias from cross dressing to castration fetish and paedophilia, especially aimed at boys. The fact that the ideological fallout of the original motivation of male gender perversity has been monetised to injure girls in the majority (becsuse they fall for cult social contagion more easily), should not divert us from what the original, dark motivation is. Take a look at WPATH and eunarch fetish, at the mad US sexologists Money and Kinsey, at Foucault and Peter Newell (who imported gender ideology to the UNCRC) and indeed the rampant sexual corruption in the UN generally… and the very founding and development of the gay rights movement in the UK leading to ILGA, (which has never been without infiltration by predators like Ian Dunn from its inception), and which has repeatedly failed to clean up its own rainbow house - see Stephen Ireland. This is why the LGB-GC rear guard action to return women just ‘some’ of their rights via a ‘GC belief’, whilst retaining rights for ‘trans’ - and thus continuing to ruin child safeguarding within a rotten UN framework of corrupted human rights and equality law - was never going to be a serious solution. And the LGB-GC exclusion of sound thinkers like @AlessandraAster or @NoXYinXXprisons and others, only goes to show the gay rights and liberal feminist movements have learned nothing, and are operating on the same doomed, ‘shhhh we know best’ mandarin fantasy of control that brought us the ‘gender’ problem in the first place.

Alessandra Asteriti 𒊩 @AlessandraAster

4 days ago

I am really tired of Bev ignoring my questions about Prof Wintemute, a trustee of the @AllianceLGB , who wrote this in July 2006. BEFORE YOGYAKARTA. If you want someone to blame @BevJacksonAuth, you can blame him.

7 10 39 7K 9

@LardShugga @UtopiaIsALie Oh yeah?! Is it indeed…

The answer there is to ban phone lines that accept calls from underage children, not to replicate the problem. We have the police, we have schools, hospitals and social workers charged with observing and stepping in where there is abuse… and we used to have NSPCC and Childine - but we saw how dodgy that became! So it’s time to recognise the wider principle, kids shouldn’t be invited to talk to adult strangers to fix their problems but to trusted adults. And yes, I know some lesbians are very clear about the propensity for abuse by men (gay or otherwise) and I appreciate that. But unfortunately, they clearly haven’t managed to hold the line, given the outrageous breaches of safeguarding and decency we now have. And that’s not to blame lesbians - I don’t see how they can be expected to withhold the force of nefarious male sexuality on their own - that should be everyone’s job.

🚩 With the best will in the world, you cannot make such an activity safe. And even if you could, you are ratifying and normalising the activity for 13 year-olds to call adult strangers for advice about sexuality, another charity might be far more dangerous. Moreover, who on Earth do these people think they are inviting other people’s underage children to talk to them online? Imagine if any other group of adults of a minority status got together and said ‘hey call this stranger to discuss your religion, race, disability, no need to ask your parents…’ and that is not even a topic as sensitive as sexuality… I really don’t know what planet they’re on. It isn’t even as if we live in a society lacking representation of gay lives.

@UtopiaIsALie And there we have it. Same old, same old. Using ‘-phobia’ accusations to silence people and putting adult equality concerns before child safeguarding. Is it not clear we have come to the end of being contained by this petty tyrannies?

An interesting observation from the Human Rights charity that still won’t call for repeal of the Protected Characteristic of Gender Reassignment, which protects cross dressing and identity fraud in front of women, children and the vulnerable anywhere men like in the workplace… 🤷‍♀️

Sex Matters @SexMattersOrg

3 days ago

🧵 There is no reason to think that professing a gender identity makes a person less likely to fit the offending patterns usual for their sex. In fact, prison data suggests that trans-identifying males may even be more likely to commit sex offences than other men.

33 385 1K 32K 117

@untoxiccon83503 Well those operating communism so often gave themselves privileges, didn’t they… some pigs being more equal than others, and all that…

He’s right. 💯 And most of the structural, constitutional revolution has already been achieved, we’re now just being dragged through the corresponding cultural revolution *after the event*, in order that we accept it and divert our lingering loyalty from a self governing, sovereign, constitutional monarchy of Great Britain, to the hollowed-out vassal territory of technocratic, socialist Modern Britain. This is why the schools are full of indoctrination - to make sure the treasonous conversion is accepted without question in future generations. The genius of the Fabian revolution was a) not to announce itself but to conduct it through impenetrable, legal sophistry in the name of something else b) to run it mostly alongside the old constitution, rather than as a full or direct replacement then c) to slowly switch our loyalty from one track to the other without us noticing the conversion. And make no mistake, whilst this revolution has been laundered through abstract, idealist human rights law and identity politics, its eventual target is materialist redistribution of property. See the words of none other than our PM Keir Starmer here, written in 1995: “Our task, as socialist lawyers, is to begin on the difficult road of drafting an instrument worthy of our conception of democracy which holds out the promise of an equal (or at any rate more equal) distribution not only of political power, but also of economic power. We could do worse than to begin by dismantling those common law rules governing the property entitlements of private parties which for almost a thousand years judges have been happy to regard as pre political norms. Keir Starmer on behalf of the Executive Committee” You see “worthy of *our* [meaning socialist lawyers’] conception of democracy” - not the British people’s, not the settled constitution that has given us internal peace for hundreds of years… but the preferred vision of a mandarin class imposed on everyone else by stealth under the guise of ‘human rights’. This is a proposal for tyranny, as surely as ever there was one - albeit the lack lustre, technocratic tyranny of a beta male son of a tool maker.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

3 days ago

When will it sink in? A sovereign country with nearly a thousand years of history is being abolished in a slow-motion revolution. I warned of this nearly 30 years ago, and all I got was mockery and patronising sneers.

135 2K 7K 218K 381

Yes the GRA should go - but perhaps the most active law is the Protected Characteristic of Gender Reassignment in the Equality Act 2010. That not only has absurdly vague wording and inadequate definitions, but it applies to people of all ages, effectively dragging children into the category of being a ‘transsexual’, which is the corresponding and historical wording from the GRA.

A point for TERFs in Australia as we move to now clawing back some single sex spaces 👇Do not concede on accepting gender in the law. It’s a lie. And leaving the lie in the law will mean something and that something will be bad for women and children.

Clare Page : No Secret Lessons @NoSecretLessons

3 days ago

This is an important division here. Anyone who wants to understand the rift between the dominant, liberal LGB-GC women’s rights activists and those labelled ‘ultra’ who are skeptical of their work (which includes me!), you need to research this area. Crucially, Bev is mistaken

2 10 43 2K 9

@KatKitten1 @AndromedaAlyxx @LucyHunterB @AlessandraAster @NoXYinXXprisons Yes, and I suspect beneath that sits a Remain vs Brexit divide, and/or a liberal Humanist vs Christian Conservative divide or an international HR governance vs British sovereignty divide.

I’ve been blocked by everyone, disinvited by everyone, refused the tiniest bit of support for my transparency campaign by everyone, had the water poisoned before meeting others… etc - and that happened before I’d even engaged - and the only thing I can put it down to is that I worked with Miriam Cates (Christian Conservative), chose Paul Conrathe as a lawyer over NC (Christian Conservative) and naively raised in a shared meeting that the Equality Act and PC of GR is a massive problem for free speech and child safeguarding that has to go - and I don’t mind repealing HRA and leaving the ECHR if necessary to ditch it. From which I can conclude they are here to defend the HRA and EA2010 from conservatives they think want repeal. But instead of discussing this openly, they block, dismiss and discredit just like TRAs and the woke have always done. And as for xenophobia - Foran is Irish and an EU member… so I’m not sure why he’d care about another European influence?