Labrador Skeptic @SaysSimulation

whether by police or any of the many citizens exercising their constitutional right to carry. We don't arrest anyone (since Biden anyway) for their posts on social media. For the Brits (or Leafs) to somehow claim they are more RW than we are is, I'm sorry to say, delusional. 3/

perspective. Our police & laws are entirely different. Any attempted foreign "rape gang" in my state would be instantly shut down by the police with extreme prejudice. Someone trying to behead another person on the street would have likely been shot dead on the spot, 2/

Meh. This UK account is inverting everything. Britain is more violent in resistance because they are in far worse trouble. The US is currently the diametric opposite of the UK in that we have a RW, anti-illegal immigrant govt. The Red states are unimaginable from a Euro 1/

Orm @orm0nde

5 hours ago

The British are the only White people consistently chimping out against mass migration and yet we often get called the most neutered by people online (usually Americans) Very interesting disconnect

72 53 967 40K 133

@SaysSimulation Goes to my oft-repeated observation that we should have >350k >145 IQs in this country, and we’re probably only effectively using a fraction of them.

@EssexJunto Meh. He's clearly a self-styled "intellectual" who hated frat boys while in college, and has carried it with him ever since. I'm neither, but this is one of the eternal themes at flagship public unis in the Heartland.

(Drill down.) Every one of those huge SEC colleges also has hundreds of people who are top fraction of 1% in intelligence. They will have twice as many when the brain drain to "status" Blue state colleges ends. This "red state = stupid" crap is moronic, and needs to stop.

Jerome Sneed Democrat @avrilbradley23

a day ago

The future ruling class of red America.

10 1 86 38K 18

@SaysSimulation I was rejected from a land grant PhD program right before COVID with a 95th percentile tile GRE score whereas the average GRE score admitted was 70th percentile. Zero white men in that years class for that program.

If we are to save our flagship public universities, we need a revolution and we need it now. This is why I wholeheartedly support what Auburn has just one. 5/ x.com/insidehighered…

Inside Higher Ed @insidehighered

5 days ago

Auburn Board Takes Full Curricular Control, Dissolves Faculty Senate The Auburn University Board of Trustees on Friday gave itself complete control over course offerings, curriculum, degree requirements and academic credentials while eliminating shared... bit.ly/4fqcUEZ

62 149 853 1.0M 231

In faculty positions, the foreign Asians preferentially admit Asians for PhD & postdoc programs as well as assistant professors, even as blacks, hispanics & women do the same things. An 85% white state may have almost no white males from that state in those types of positions. 4/

The Big 10 & SEC are where the battle is being fought right now, and we're currently losing, even in Trumps' 2nd term. The issue falls into 3 parts: DEI, foreigners, and hiring. The admissions depts are completely captured, and they highly favor DEI applicants not just 1/

Sam the Stock Man @StocksnWeights

3 hours ago

@SaysSimulation Notable that the Big10 and SEC as of a decade ago also weren’t complete knife fights for spots in these programs. Yeah there were plenty of migroids but anyone who could make it to State had a chance for a crack at engineering/CS. Didn’t need perfect striver accolades

0 0 6 3K 0

@WardoftheStates BioLeninist is far superior but had too many characters for the tweet.

Behold the Libtard mind at work. Credentialism over rationality. "Elite graduate schools" heavily discriminate against white male Americans, particularly from the interior. That is supported by Leftists. But then, in their idiot minds, that becomes proof white males are inferior.

Dante Jefferson @DanteJeffe14617

15 hours ago

@SaysSimulation This is crazy cope. These schools are not scientifically productive and their students get into elite graduate schools at low rates. Some of these schools are less selective than the ancillary campuses of UMass.

2 0 1 3K 0

We're already seeing it with Harris and AOC, but the Dem leadership is becoming remarkably stupid people elected on straight-up ethnic and gender basis combined with obvious voter fraud. We really should be able to beat these people. 3/

think (or likely care) about is that the next generation of Harvard graduates that may become national leaders can't read or understand a full length book, and may struggle with the basics of algebra and geometry. That nation will be unable compete internationally. 2/

What the Left did with the Ivies is a good insight into how their thinking works. The Ivies account for a huge number of CEOs, CFOs, judges, Senators, bankers, etc., so by making the Ivies 70% "diverse", they make 70% of the next generation of leaders diverse. What they didn't

Labrador Skeptic @SaysSimulation

8 hours ago

as well. As the Ivies were systematically institutionally captured, they threw it all away on the altars of DEI & race communism. They no longer take the smartest, and they are also purging the legacies. It's all just Leftist institutional capture at this point. 4/

3 3 113 37K 8

@NYewno The damage has been immense, but there is still a huge talent pool in the Heartland public universities that is vastly better than the H1Bs.

Harvard has had to add remedial math courses since dropping the SATs. The coastal "elite" mindset says those people strugglin with Algebra 1 are more intelligent than someone acing partial differential equations in a Heartland public uni BY DEFINITION because... credential. Wow.

Labrador Skeptic @SaysSimulation

13 hours ago

Many such cases! Beliefs about intelligence & education are where the staggering stupidity of the coastal libtard mind becomes most apparent - including some in the RW. The engineering programs of the best flagship public unis in the Midwest & South are superb. In comparison, 1/

4 8 200 36K 35

during the peak of the merit-based era of around the 1950s to 1970s, it is likely true that likely 10%+ of the very smartest people in the US went to the Ivy+, even if 80%+ did not. That era is completely gone. 6/

The genius of the prior strategy was that setting aside half their student bodies for the smartest students from the entire nation, the myth could be created that all of the smartest students in the nation went to the Ivies. This was never true of course, but nonetheless, 5/

Historically, the Ivies were more about social class than meritocracy. Young men went to Harvard & Yale to earn "gentleman's Cs" while drinking & joining organizations with their fellow future bankers, judges, politicians and so forth. The mid to late 20th century 1/

Lord Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer @ape2ag

8 hours ago

@SaysSimulation The bell curves reassert themselves every generation with considerable overlap. Ostensibly, we don't have a hereditary elite, but elites resist downward mobility for their kids. Ivies have carefully managed elite churn by balancing merit and legacy. Excessive DEI wrecked that.

0 0 14 21K 5