Syed Hussain @SerialTechX

Meet and talk to our Founder & CEO @SerialTechX at @TokenizeCon and learn more about what a post-agentic world looks like.

Tokenize! Conference @TokenizeCon

3 months ago

Will AI eat the world? Syed Hussain is already building inside it. Syed Hussain (@SerialTechX), Founder & CEO of @SHIZA_AI, is joining the "Will Open Claw Eat the World?" panel at Tokenize! LATAM in San Juan. 🗓 March 29–31, 2026 🎟 luma.com/TokenizeSJ2026

0 0 5 468 0

Hahaha! My team has been saying the same thing to me the last two weeks!😂

Brian Armstrong @brian_armstrong

4 months ago

Beware, it's 2026 and the CEO is back in the code base thanks to AI.

560 221 5K 1.1M 273

@MaxMusing I'm one of the "SaaS will be dead soon" guys and this is a very sensible perspective, which I'm fully onboard with. Clearly not all SaaS will be dead, but this is the good, hard, strong kick in the ass that SaaS companies needed.

@lesabrefomo @goatedbaklava @KellyClaudeAI @FelixCraftAI Don't forget @SHIZA_AI

@lesabrefomo 🎯

The Agentic Workforce is coming!

SHIZA @SHIZA_AI

4 months ago

Building a "bot" is easy. Building a high-performance SHIZA AWF agent is an engineering feat. To thrive in the post-labor economy, an agent needs more than a prompt, it needs a DNA of Autonomy, Planning, and Adaptability. 🧵

1 1 7 284 0

"Own Your AI Before AI Owns You"

SHIZA @SHIZA_AI

4 months ago

In the post-agentic economy, the question isn’t if AI will replace jobs, it’s who will own the agents that do. 🏗️ Our founder breaks down why you shouldn't just use AI, but own it as a sovereign asset. Don't rent your future from Big Tech. Build it on SHIZA. 🔐 Build. Capture.

0 1 10 351 0

@Ibrahimifg 100% brother. Seen this coming for the last 2 years and been building the Ark @SHIZA_AI

2020: "So you blockchain guys have built a solution and are now looking for a problem" 2026: "Agents are creating a multi-trillion dollar problem that will require a solution to enable a post-agentic economy" "Blockchain UX has always been shit for humans because blockchains weren't built for humans. Signing transactions, gas, bridging. Humans hate it. Agents don't care. Most onchain activity is already bots. We've been building machine infrastructure this whole time." 💯

Looking forward to GAIB 2.0 👀!!

_gabrielShapir0 @lex_node

4 months ago

a lot of my ETH bros are coping imo and clinging to the L2 vision after Vitalik's xeet because we (including me) invested so much mental energy into the L2 vision, defending it against Solana bros about it, etc maybe because I've had a lot of trauma in my life (and my crypto

28 3 108 7K 15

@Voxyz_ai Gold!

@Motion_Viz SYSTEM

@stevesi's historical analysis is spot-on, but his conclusion needs more nuance. His conclusion: We'll have MORE software, not less. Domain expertise becomes MORE valuable. Every historical transition he cites had humans building the new systems. This time: AGENTS building software. Not humans. (We know this because this is exactly what we're doing.) Yes, domain experts will guide the building. But the NUMBER of domain experts needed will be exponentially smaller. "More people work in banking today than ever before." True. Because humans were still building and operating the systems. When agents build AND operate the systems, you don't need more people. You need fewer people with higher expertise. The math doesn't work the same way this time. Value shifts from builders (massively in demand today) to the few domain experts who can guide agents. This isn't about timeline. It's about WHO OWNS the infrastructure when this happens (very soon). When agents replace builders, who owns those agents? Big Tech? Or individuals? That determines whether this transition creates shared prosperity or concentrated wealth. He's completely right: This is exciting, not scary. He's partially right: Domain expertise alone won't save the middle class alone. OWNERSHIP of AI agents will. Not UBI. Not job retraining. OWNERSHIP. "Own your AI, before AI owns you."

Great analysis and 100% with you on newer software being built and domain expertise becoming more valuable. However your conclusion misses something critical: Every transition you cite had HUMANS building the new systems: PC era → Humans building GUI software, Internet → Humans building websites, Streaming → Humans building platforms. This time: AGENTS building software. Not humans. Yes, domain experts will guide agent-built systems. But the NUMBER of domain experts needed is exponentially smaller than the number of builders today. Different math. Different economic system. Very exciting times ahead indeed, but we need to begin thinking about post-labor economics in a post-agentic world, so we can position ourselves for thriving in this new frontier.

BTC hit $62K. ETH $1,850. SOL $78. Couldn't have chosen a worse time to launch $AWF. But our job isn't to time the market. Our job is to build. And building is what we're doing. No one tells you that most of the time, being a founder fucking sucks. Grinding in silence. Revenue's slow. Market's brutal. Team's exhausted. You question everything because it's all on you. Then randomly, out of the blue, one of your investors sends this: Totally random. Total bro moment. This shit hits different when you're in the trenches. It's lonely at the top. Find your bros. Nothing like it. They won't fix the market. They won't solve your problems. But they'll remind you why you need to keep going. Building through the bear. Bismillah. 🚀

@akshay_pachaar Behetreen bhai!

@v_computer Keen to try it out! Let's go!

Shots fired! This is actually hilarious!! 😂

Grant @Grantblocmates

4 months ago

Anthropic have just buried OpenAI and ChatGPT with this ad lmfao There’s no coming back from that

603 3K 35K 3.0M 7K

@DCinvestor @_nonfungible @postedgo Building exactly this @SHIZA_AI: medium.com/@SerialTechX/e…. Let's chat!

One of the fundamental mistakes that people are making is associating jobs with purpose, which is completely wrong. A human's purpose is not associated with his job. A job serves as a mechanism for the human to help achieve his purpose. A job is fluid and changes based on a variety of factors so yes there will always be a job, but the economic value associated with the job is what will change quite drastically. Yes, there will be a mass disruption to the economic value associated with jobs and the overall labor markets, but I also think it's wrong to associate that with a dystopian society. If anything, this will lead to mass abundance because things will become incredibly affordable due to the most expensive line item on any P&L (human labor) being removed from it. Humans will have more to do, so we will create different jobs, but the jobs "market" as we've known it thus far will forever change. On the flip side, pretending that AI will not cause a mass disruption to the labor markets is equally as wrong. There is a mass disruption that's coming and humanity will adjust to it. There will be short term pain, but in the long term it will be for the better.