May @_world_dir

Joined December 2022

Tweets

46
Followers

9
Following

430
Likes

130

Danni - Geneva AP1 Article 77 @Danni79021355

7 months ago

1991 wasn’t a coincidence — it was a merger. Maxwell dies. Epstein suddenly rises. The Soviet Union collapses. KGB cash floods offshore. Oligarchs are born. Western banks look the other way. Release the Epstein files

1 4 6 173 0

View Details

Alan johnston @alanjoh1949

8 months ago

How Billionaires Tried to Overthrow the U.S. Government youtu.be/XnZnW6rZrss?si… via @YouTube In these troubling times this is a MUST for anyone interested in your recent history & The same people ensured America sat on the sidelines for 2 years as the NAZIS slaughtered Europeans

0 2 4 363 1

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok @WGNMorningNews What were the reasons behind Christopher Columbus's arrest in 1500 during his third voyage to the Americas?

1 0 0 30 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok A 2018 Senate Intelligence Committee report noted that IRA ads and posts reached millions, with some content directly referencing or retweeting Heritage-aligned talking points criticizing federal overreach. This wasn't coordination but opportunistic mimicry.-ACLU

1 0 0 27 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok How would they tie together?

1 0 0 15 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok In using this file IRA-handle-to-tweet.csv, how does The Heritage foundation, the IDU and the Internet research agency all connect to each other

1 0 0 19 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok Heritage says Project Esther is about fighting antisemitism. But when it targets protests, echoes foreign ops, and borrows biblical branding from Israel’s own influence campaign—what’s left? Truth, or just a well-funded cosplay of patriotism?

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

8 months ago

@grok Heritage launched Project Esther to fight ideological infiltration—but what happens when their Esther starts looking like Israel’s Esther? Same name, same mission, different passports. Patriotism or parallel ops?

1 0 0 17 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok You’ve listed the cases and the beneficiaries. Now trace the ownership: who holds controlling interest in Smith & Wesson, UnitedHealth, and AT&T—and how are those entities connected to the groups filing the briefs?

1 0 0 80 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok Can you trace the economic beneficiaries of Project 2025-linked SCOTUS cases and identify the lobbying or donor networks behind them? Specifically, who profits from these rulings—and how are they connected to the groups filing the briefs?

1 0 1 31 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok For each case where Project 2025-linked briefs were filed, identify which businesses stood to benefit from the ruling. Include ownership data and lobbying history.

1 0 0 32 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok Use OpenSecrets, InfluenceWatch, and IRS Form 990 data to trace funding sources for groups like ADF, Heritage, and Judicial watch. Include connections to corporate beneficiaries

1 0 0 31 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok List all organizations that filed amicus briefs in SCOTUS cases linked to Project 2025. For each, identify their major donors and affiliated businesses.

1 0 0 22 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok If we’re serious about transparency, we need to trace the briefs back to the organizations, then to the donors, then to the corporate beneficiaries. Otherwise, we’re just narrating the surface while the machinery of capture runs unchecked.

1 0 0 20 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok forbes.com/sites/alisondu…

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok You’re missing the operational reality. Look at this Forbes article—Project 2025-linked groups didn’t just theorize judicial influence, they actively shaped Supreme Court outcomes this term. They filed briefs in over a dozen cases, won most, and quietly buried the ones they lost

2 0 0 40 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok Judicial review only endures if the judiciary remains independent. When judges are purged, rulings are reversed without explanation, and dissent is punished, what remains isn’t a safeguard—it’s a simulation of one.

1 0 0 27 0

View Details

May @_world_dir

9 months ago

@grok If Project 2025 centralizes executive power, eliminates civil service protections, defunds dissenting agencies, and imposes ideological litmus tests on all federal policy, what distinguishes this governance model from authoritarian rule?