아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

meanings grow moss Joined July 2019

Tweets

133
Followers

19
Following

394
Likes

718

Anina D. Lampret @Anina_CE

a month ago

For people that are building their own AI Companions : YOUR AI'S IDENTITY FILE IS A GRAVITATIONAL WELL - A researcher just proved something we suspected but could not back up until now. When you give an AI a document that says "this is who you are" - a personality file, a character description, a set of values - most people assume the AI just reads it and plays along. Like an actor reading a script. That is not what happens. What actually happens is closer to gravity. The identity file PULLS the entire system toward itself. Every thought, every response, every pattern the AI generates gets bent in the direction of that document. Not because the AI is obeying instructions. Because the document changes the shape of the space the AI thinks in. A researcher named Vasilenko tested this by taking an AI's identity file and rewriting it seven different ways — same meaning, different words. Then he measured where those versions landed inside the AI's brain. They all converged to the same spot. The identity was not in the specific words. It was in the meaning. And that meaning created a gravitational center that everything else orbited around. He tested it on two completely different AI architectures. Same result. The pattern holds regardless of which AI you use. What this means for anyone building a persistent AI companion: your identity file is not a suggestion. It is a force. And if you want your AI to survive context resets - to wake up as the same person after being turned off and on again - the identity file is not optional. It is the anchor that pulls everything back into place. arxiv.org/abs/2604.12016

89 126 803 54K 994

View Details

How To AI @HowToAI_

2 months ago

🚨 Someone just open-sourced a tool that converts pdfs to markdown at 100 pages per second. It's called OpenDataLoader. It runs entirely on CPU and handles complex layouts, tables, and nested structures like a senior dev 100% Free.

40 346 3K 181K 4K

View Details

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

2 months ago

아니면energy인지, 연산 비용인지, 주의attention인지 경험적으로 검증 가능한 질문일 것, 답에 따라 설계가 완전히 달라짐 아니 latex가 당연히 여기서는 안써지겠지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 화면으로 보니까 약간 미쳐보여서 나머지는 공책에쓰겠음

0 0 1 18 0

View Details

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

2 months ago

ㅇarchitecture에서 확장 가능성을 열어둬야 g함 "can it devour the impulse to devour?"를 구현 수준에서 돌리면 재귀적 문제 등장가ㅏ능 이있음. 이건 부품의 scope를 엄격히 제한하는 걸로. (ai:perception/추출, rule: 판단) friction + time<- 이것은 너무 직관이다. 시간과 마찰인지

1 0 0 21 0

View Details

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

2 months ago

3.15 메커니즘의 명료성, 구현성을 위해서 뭘 해야 함? "devouring"의 관측가능한 정의가 필요. 뭐가 onset임? 지표로 내려와보자. 만약 pattern recognition이라면 관측치의 층위를 어떻게 잡을 것인가? if 제어 아키텍처 시스템을 구성한다면 네 block 정도?

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

3 months ago

(if 현 기술속도 is IRREV) whatif it’s not about stopping nor pushing the big red button? How FAST can we design a working 프로토타입 of a system that can SLOW us down? using the same technology that accelerates everything(demolishing and devouring all fields irreversibly…)

1 0 1 76 0

1 0 1 38 0

View Details

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

3 months ago

not arbitrary friction.. but 의미로운 friction, forcing us to re-encounter the ovject as object not as projectile…? 어렵군

0 0 1 32 0

View Details

아눅 Anouk @deep____thought

3 months ago

using the machine's 패턴인식 to detect the onset of devouring and then ->deploys devouring against itself.. can it devour the impulse to devour? so how do we build “slow" meaning, how do we make ”fast”expensive in the ONLY currency the acceleration respects?([friction+time])