Jerry David Chan @digitsu

I've been waiting ~8 years for this moment... when crypto's intrinsic capabilities (and economies of scale) finally become the defining feature. I've always said the killer feature is the ability to buy something for <0.01, not storing value or sending millions or avoiding capital controls. It took the need for AI Agentic agency to make that use case really stand out. Now its time to put it all together and actually usher is a new economy!

Loremaster Self-hosted version update! Getting Voice and PDF upgrades to make it on par with the hosted version! patreon.com/loremastervtt/…

@anndylian Bought the book. Nice to know someone with a similar blockchain background's take on the current AI innovations. The 2 seem to be a match made in heaven, as finally blockchain has a use case that isn't just another speculative asset for get-rich-quick leeches on the economy

@EquityDiamonds @kurtwuckertjr @HijackingBTC @VinnyLingham @BMcGleenon @patrickbetdavid @jakeshieldsajj @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork @joerogan @ShawnRyanShow Not much different at all

@EquityDiamonds @kurtwuckertjr @HijackingBTC @VinnyLingham @BMcGleenon @patrickbetdavid @jakeshieldsajj @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork @joerogan @ShawnRyanShow Core people were blinded by money

@neerajjj6785 Elixir

patreon.com/posts/loremast…

@CharlesMullins2 It’s simple to explain if you accept the theory we are in a computer simulation.

@muhendisIiktr At this point you shouldn’t call it a motorcycle anymore (what exactly is the cycle?) and call it an electric horse.

@ronsterd89 Skin

@BSAT_Properties Meanwhile, in other parts of the world, people are more concerned about using the correct gender pronouns for the ever increasing number of invented genders, just so that people can feel 'safe' and accepted.

HOT TAKE: what is wrong with this picture? If someone who is obviously male, tells you to that they pronouns are He/They -- he comes across as a pretentious douchebag. (and rightly so) If someone who is obviously female, tells you that zhey goes by zhey/her, you would think zhey are just virtue signalling. But if in either of the previous cases, if they male person had pink hair, or the female had a nose ring and black lipstick, it would be socially acceptable to give such pronouns specifications because they look queer "enough" to warrant them. What determines queer-enough? Must you look queer to choose your pronouns? If I choose my pronouns to me "Lord Master Zee", am I being cynical and callous or are you the listener just being insensitive of my gender rights?

patreon.com/posts/new-feat…

First mathematical derivation of the fine-structure constant ever. Lfg! blog.floatingpragma.io/fine-structure…

@MotherDragonBSV Concurrency as a first class primitive

bsv_sdk v1.0.0 for Elixir 🚀 First stable release of the Bitcoin SV SDK — a full-stack Elixir library for BSV. What's in the box: • Primitives — keys, scripts, transactions, BIP-32 HD keys, BIP-39 mnemonics • Contract DSL — define locking/unlocking scripts as pure Elixir pipelines • Built-in contracts — P2PKH, P2PK, P2MS, P2RPH (R-puzzle), OpReturn, Raw • OP_PUSH_TX — covenant support via PushTxHelpers • STAS/DSTAS token protocol support • SPV — Merkle paths, BEEF parsing/validation • Wallet — BRC-42/43 key derivation, BRC-77/78 message signing/encryption • Transport clients — ARC, JungleBus • Security audited — FORKID enforcement, timing-safe comparisons, ECDH hardening Includes ALL functionality in the BSV-ex package, which is no longer maintained by the maintainer. This should be your BSV SDK if you are an Elixir programmer. 📦 hex.pm/packages/bsv_s… 📖 hexdocs.pm/bsv_sdk 🔗 github.com/Bittoku/bsv_sd…

Chicken and the egg problem. “If gravity was 1% different…” assumes the given laws of physics in our universe. If the laws of physics were different then any conclusions we draw from such a hypothetical question are of no consequence. Gravity is exactly the way it is, in our universe because the laws of physics are the way they are. Did the laws have to be defined first then gravity set to match it such that we would exist?? Or did gravity constants get set first and the laws formed around it? Or simply they are one and the same and come as a set. That set as a whole is required for us to exist. Examining gravity alone is pointless.

Fundamental breakdown of political alignments: Far right: Ultra conservative individualists who believe that personal rights are earned and not necessarily granted. They believe the world is broken due to the leftists. Won’t change things on their own but if mobilized under a common cause will fight fanatically for it. Conservatives: Believe that the current political and economic systems are mostly working and therefore will be cautious and resist change unless very clearly justified. Believe and will defend individual rights over those of a hypothetical greater good. Look inward rather than outward. Liberals: Believe that the current economic and political systems are mostly broken and therefore push constantly for change choosing to error on the side of any change is better than no change and willing to accept that some changes may result in a regression of rights and personal liberties, betting on the fact that net of all changes overall will result in a net good. They see issue and problems with all systems currently in existence and seek to change them, except for the null hypothesis which is that the conservatives vs liberal dichotomy is a positive factor in avoiding dictatorship and authoritarianism. Far left: Same as liberal except that they do not accept the null hypothesis and will actively campaign to take down and neutralize the establishment, including conservative or dissenting voices, whether individually or as a mobilized group movement. They look outward and constantly believe it is their duty to change people and convert them to actively support their cause. Believe in the hypothetical greater good overriding individual rights as long as they can rationalize it to themselves. Socialists: Liberals who in addition believe that the good judgment of those put in power and the power vested in them are better trusted and override individual rights and liberties so long as the greater good is served. Believe that individuals should be forced to give up something so that the greater good can be served. Capitalists: Those who believe that capital itself (and its constructs such as companies) can rise to balance that of elected governments with the fundamental thesis that raising and growing capital is a costly signal of skill and competence to counterbalance the political system of the popularity contest Communists Believe fully in the wisdom of those elected or placed in power over those who are governed, so long as it can be conveyed in a way which can seen as for the greater good of the people. Capital itself has no power as state controls power. Only the populist political system controls power. In order to remove the power of capital strict controls over the economy and individual rights are required. Facists: Similar to communism with the only difference being they employ a form of crony capitalism and have a much larger focus on expansionism and nationalism. Individual rights fair better than in communism.

@shadilayvision looks great for SDK and libraries listings

@ViktorKlopp I remember this. Also the NEOM Line anyone? the world is fully of a lot of dumb ideas, and people willing to fund them.

Verifying my developer account on BSV Radar. Code: BSV-MCAG #BSVRadar