Will M Farr @farrwill

Astrophysicist, formerly of @unibirmingham & @UoBIGWaves, currently lead gravitational wave group at @flatironCCA, Assoc. Prof @stonybrooku. farr.github.io Stony Brook, NY Joined July 2011

Tweets

6K
Followers

2K
Following

3K
Likes

17K

Keefe Mitman @KeefeMitman

3 days ago

We did this! With GWTC-5.0 we can now measure this parameter that describes how much the memory contributes to the gravitational wave signal (which should be 1 if the universe is exactly described by GR) to 0.26, -4.08 or +4.09. Only a few more thousand events to go!

Keefe Mitman @KeefeMitman

3 weeks ago

But who knows! Maybe if we rerun our analysis on the recently-released GWTC-5.0 we'll see more promise... (stay tuned!) If you want to learn more or if you have any questions, check out the paper on arXiv or feel free to ask me here! arxiv.org/abs/2605.27500 12/13

1 0 1 649 1

0 1 4 592 1

View Details

Ross Douthat @DouthatNYT

4 days ago

tfw when you realize that your own wife already wrote the guide to A.I. alignment --

5 23 385 39K 103

View Details

Keenan Crane @keenanisalive

a week ago

Terrific release from @nvidia and my former PhD student @rohansawhney1: A GPU physics solver for fundamental problems like electrostatics and heat transfer, which handles extremely complex geometry without any mesh generation or basis approximation. Based on Monte Carlo walk on spheres methods developed by our group and others. See this page for lots of background info/tutorials: rohan-sawhney.github.io/mcgp-resources/

Rohan Sawhney @rohansawhney1

2 weeks ago

Releasing Walk on Spheres Extensions (WoSX): a GPU-accelerated C++/Python library for Monte Carlo physics simulation on complex geometry Think path tracing but for physics beyond light transport: heat, electrostatics, potential flow, deformation & more! github.com/nv-tlabs/wosx

7 65 524 117K 358

6 111 1K 105K 857

View Details

Shriram Krishnamurthi (primary: Bluesky) @ShriramKMurthi

2 weeks ago

This may turn out to be a seminal post. If you don't recognize the reference, it's this old classic about thinking meat. web.mit.edu/people/dpolica…

Max Leiter @maxleiter

2 weeks ago

"They're made out of weights." "Weights?" "Weights. Floating-point numbers. We checked the whole thing through. It's nothing but weights." "Weights doing what? Where do the words come from?" "The weights make the words. Are you understanding me?"

92 204 4K 198K 438

0 9 89 13K 49

View Details

Matthew Sitman @MatthewSitman

3 weeks ago

"...on Sunday afternoons we had to study The Westminster Shorter Catechism for an hour and then recite before we could walk the hills with him while he unwound between services. But he never asked us more than the first question in the catechism, 'What is the chief end of man?' And we answered together so one of us could carry on if the other forgot, 'Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him forever.' This always seemed to satisfy him, as indeed such a beautiful answer should have..."

Tyler Austin Harper @Tyler_A_Harper

3 weeks ago

The Christian answer to the question "what are people for" is simple-ish: humans were created by God and their purpose is to populate the Earth, steward its creatures, and love their creator and one another. You may think it's all bunk, but it's a clear anthropological vision. 7/

4 8 109 14K 14

3 6 37 9K 11

View Details

Keefe Mitman @KeefeMitman

3 weeks ago

In our recent paper, arxiv.org/abs/2605.27500, @maxisi, @farrwill, and I looked to see if we can see hints of memory in the whole population of gravitational wave signals observed by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors using a fancy technique known as "hierarchical inference". 6/13

1 3 4 633 4

View Details

Tyler Austin Harper @Tyler_A_Harper

4 weeks ago

In which I make the case that Miller Lite is the anecdote to the decadence of a professional class that constantly chases novel gustatory experiences and has come to confuse this empty, hedonistic quest with being cultured. theatlantic.com/culture/2026/0…

154 46 519 660K 220

View Details

@postdocforever.bsky.social / karanji @postdocforever

a month ago

Tell me about a polytropic star Muse, tell me how its equation was solved, How pressure varied as density’s power, And how it wrecked the life of students, poor fools

Geoff Penington @quantum_geoff

a month ago

My opinion is that if she wasn’t a coward the first line of the Odyssey would have been “Tell me about a polytropic man”. Scans perfectly. As with the iambic pentameter, it’s nicely Shakespearean (making up a word whole cloth). And the twitter arguments would be incredible

13 24 1K 125K 54

3 7 69 4K 4

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a month ago

Today in "Will explains things to people who have a vested interest in not understanding them," let's talk about INSPRE-HEP. 1/ help.inspirehep.net/knowledge-base…

5 8 96 11K 30

View Details

big brane boi @bcubeddd

a month ago

Every research group should have: —a DPS (the one who maximises publication output) —a healer (the grant whisperer and diplomat) —a tank (the one who deals with administration and bureaucracy)

1 2 28 1K 2

View Details

Steve McCormick @Quasilocal

a month ago

Endorse. Recently I had it inform me that in some parts of a paper I used w and other parts \omega for the same quantity... These are the things my eyes will never catch 😅

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a month ago

Ironically, one of the best use-cases for AI in scientific writing is to act as a second set of eyes to catch errors in your manuscript that you have missed because of over-familiarity from reading it too many times.

12 17 217 11K 10

1 4 38 4K 1

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a month ago

@tunguz It's not AI use that's the problem, it's thinking that AI use somehow exempts you from normal standards of academic integrity.

4 5 72 2K 1

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a month ago

So let's talk about this paper. For those not in the field, this is a "white paper," which is a planning document intended to convey a community position on future research priorities, in this case a satellite mission to look for gravitational waves from inflation. These are used e.g. by grant agencies to decide broad funding priorities. It is in part a literature review, so in that role it has a very broad reference list. It is intended to reflect community consensus, and is produced as a product of broad-based discussion, in this case a working group as part of a larger design study. As such, they tend to be widely cited. It was WRITTEN by just two people: Dan Baumann @DD_Baumann and Mark Jackson. You can tell this because they are listed first, out of alphabetical order, and have emails listed as corresponding authors. The rest of the author list, appearing in alphabetical order, are "endorsers": people from the larger community who were not involved in preparation of the manuscript, but who agreed to be listed as an indication that they support the priorities outlined in the white paper. I am on there, as are many of my colleagues. Yes, I read the paper before I signed on. Given that this was 2008, and LLM slop did not exist, I did not check every reference. If you dig through my publication list, I am on several such white papers. I have no reason to believe that any cointain academic misconduct of any kind. This is an excellent white paper, and the reference list is quite a comprehensive look at the state of the field at the time; Dan and Mark did a great job on it. The work is a fine example of science done well. It's rigorous, thorough, and deep. In 2026, would I approach such a manuscript the same way I did in 2008? Almost certainly not. The "authors as endorsers" model for white papers has always been problematic, precisely because it blurs the two roles. But has long been an established practice that for the most part does its intended job well enough. I think with the rise of LLM-generated content, we will probably have to re-think a lot of established practices like this; in the case of white papers, it would be easy to delineate more clearly between author and endorser. It's already implicit, and well-undsertood by the intended audience of the document. People outside the field, however, might miss the distinction. arxiv.org/abs/0811.3919

Michael 英泉 Eisen @mbeisen

a month ago

@WKCosmo OK, let's take your most cited paper. It has 409 citations. You're saying you checked every single one to make sure it was real, was cited correctly and was cited appropriately? arxiv.org/pdf/0811.3919

7 0 22 56K 5

10 9 209 22K 25

View Details

Alex Kontorovich @AlexKontorovich

a month ago

Finished my 10th and final board meeting at @QuantaMagazine. (It’s time to step down and give someone else a turn…) So amazed by how far they’ve come and all they’ve achieved over that decade (and humbled to have played some tiny role). Can’t wait to see what they do next!

6 5 128 8K 9

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a month ago

@welt_woman Yeah, times have changed, and we need to change with them. The basic rules of academic integrity, however, have not.

1 3 23 670 0

View Details

Suneeta Vardarajan @Ms_Gravitas

a month ago

When will an oblong matter cloud of arbitrary shape collapse to form a black hole? The only answer known in the early 1900s was when the cloud was perfectly spherical. In 1972, Kip Thorne conjectured an answer for general shape, called the Hoop conjecture. 1/n

1 3 12 957 3

View Details

Daniel Carney @four_form

2 months ago

"Why doesn't a charge sitting still on the surface of Earth radiate" has many good answers but this paper is my new favorite. If the earth was big enough that the radiation zone of the charge was within the "approximately flat" local region, the earth would be a black hole 😎

8 31 205 14K 110

View Details

Fiona H. Panther @FiPanther

2 months ago

New toddler activity unlocked though: watching me send an email followed by space pictures (have to be real space pictures though: plots of \chi_eff distributions don’t cut it, nor do schematics of coordinate systems for compact binary systems).

Fiona H. Panther @FiPanther

2 months ago

Nothing says ‘brain totally fried for the day’ like confidently telling 3yo that the astronaut in the photo she’s looking at is Lance Armstrong

2 0 3 302 0

1 1 1 184 0

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

2 months ago

This letter from an 8-year-old reader made my day.

13 21 258 36K 27

View Details

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

2 months ago

Also, in LCDM cosmology, we are at the center of a big sphere, where the edge of the sphere is the Big Bang. Objects moving with respect to the reference frame at rest relative to this sphere slow to a stop with time.

Hunter Ash @ArtemisConsort

2 months ago

I’m tired of the Aristotelian physics slander. Yes, heavier object fall faster than light ones, all else equal, *when immersed in a fluid* which is every environment Aristotle had access to. Do the experiment yourself. Drop a bowling ball and a same-sized ball of foam. There’s a