Tony Kilcoyne @implants

@TheBTCTherapist A lot of the established bankers, hate what he is doing to them and their measly 0.1% interest on the majority of retail accounts! Like they used to hate on BTC originally, remember?

@CarlosBtnoCigar @bennyjohnson Bill gates is the least bad - the vaccine on a population-scale, reduces severity and dramatically reduces hospitalisation & deaths overall, is the accurate answer IMHO. Almost nobody was routinely testing if they had the appropriate IgG immune response and thus reduced risks?!?

@marc02200 There’s a lot of short-term shenanigans going on, people shorting/manipulating for short-term profits, basically. Think Gamestop, but with superior assets maybe? Meanwhile, us ordinary folk take the medium to longer-term view, through such temporary FUD, perhaps?

@JacobKinge One wonders if certain banks and institutions, want this to fail, because if us ordinary folks can get 10%+ interest upon our savings, then who is going to use banks?!? Yours curiously, Tony.

@James_Steward @imlirvingit If you are serious, then there should be a ‘non of the above’ option, which if a majority selected, would result in a random citizen being appointed, like Jury duty!

@Investanswers Sorry here to hear this - here in the UK we got about 21% of what we asked for. Now don’t ask me why UK retail got favoured over USA investors, it doesn’t make sense does it? Yours also observationally, Tony.

@PeterSchiff That’s what I’m they said about gold 5 years before that too! Yours relatively, Tony.

@elias_richer @CNN Low pressure at altitude, surely? Too many things have batteries in them now, plus I thought hold luggage was in containers that suppress explosions, so make them fire-proof too maybe? Last but not least, doesn’t X-raying images of luggage pick up such dense batteries?

Can do that with just one stick, turning the 0 to a 9 in same style, thus 992. Two sticks can make other several options. If it’s the largest number above 902 rather than ‘any’ as the original proposition implies, then assuming a 1 can be made with 2 sticks, remove the top and bottom sticks of the zero, leaving 11, then make another 1 with the two sticks removed and place it at the end (leaving the 9 as largest digit initially), thus creating 91121 evenly spaced ;) Yours possibly, Tony :)

@PeterSchiff @saylor Dear Peter, you know you can use it yourself or rent it out ;) By the way, is it true that for every Oz of gold in storage, on average there are x4 paper owners who think it is their’s alone? Yours curiously, Tony.

I think this is saying, this is what asset-weakthy people do with shares, property etc - loan against it, rather than sell and trigger taxes losing half of it, maybe? Of course tgere’s other costs, setting up trust, maintenance, regulation and acciunting, but if high %tax payer already then THAT is what makes it worthwhile. Otherwise not so much - also loans are high % rate, some 8-15% currently, as if they weren’t collateralised. Get that down to 1-3% THEN this coukd take off as a scheme, so to speak. Yours possibly, Tony.

@AdamBLiv Financial freedom - it allows choices equally, unlike mainstream wallstreet I guess. It doesn’t fix bad decision-making or borrowing more than you earn to spend, indebtedness etc. Like some Governments I could mention lol

@Arden_2210 Look at differences = 18, 16, 14, so next two down in sequence would have differences of 12, so 4= 28, then next level 3, a difference of 10 = 18 net. So answer is 18 :)

@FinanceLancelot Can you pick a more unfavourable timeline from the charts please? Oh wait………. lol

He’s behaving like Bonds, but for Corporate Bonds, much better underlying assets at a much higher % interest earned! All bonds have risks and the BANKS who bought Government bonds at 0.5% ten year yields, in big numbers during Covid (believing interest rates would stay low or go to zero!), are going to have viability issues WAY before MSTR options do :o His move is genious, brave and innovative, so if you don’t like volatility and like double-digit interest rates, fill your bags lol Yes if you want even better returns, hold BTC directly if volatility doesn’t scare you. Gold’s problem is as price rises, it becomes more viable to open (or reopen) more mines and simply make more - Bitcoin has that max. 21million limit, thus increasing scarcity & store of value/security as we enter that last million coins ever to be mined :o Yours logically, Tony :)

@Airaasayss A = black, in the word BLACK ;)

@imPenny2x Sadly history tells us these ‘advances’ will be weaponised by megalomaniac leaders somewhere - why make it through hard work and share, when you can take it and rule the world, mentality?

I suspect (who can really know anyway) he made the claim to cleverly see how the Iranian leadership communicated this to the top, to be able to know to deny it publicly, with the CIA monitoring comms/chatter to see who & where that subject was transmitted perhaps?!? War propaganda & tactics are opaque to us mostly!!

@VijaySelvam Because the market for a steady, predictable % return is huge, compared to volatility of stocks risks. That’s how all bonds work - you are asking why buy bonds and not stocks, as over time, stocks out-perform! It’s about lack of volatility being prioritised.

@comic Wow, 2 years is your timeline lol Isn’t that being like a trader rather than an investor?!? Mind you, this current dip now means, many can STILL be early to the BTC diversification strategy, but please, think more 5-10yr timescales! Yours more realistically, Tony.