🇨🇦 @koroutine

Across this pale blue dot, a speck in the cosmic sprawl, a frenzied chaos spins, taunting the frail, fleeting dreams of lives that flicker and fade. ? Joined July 2024

Tweets

3K
Followers

112
Following

2K
Likes

18K

Beff (e/acc) @beffjezos

20 hours ago

Claude Fable 5 is the first ever officially Decel model Literally a Sophon that will sabotage @OpenAI please mog them ASAP

Glinert 🇺🇸 🏭 @StevenGlinert

23 hours ago

I feel like anthropic’s whole shtick is “using safety-ism in the service of anticompetitive behavior”. (Probably why he dislikes China so much, since it’s not like he’s a big national security guy)

4 8 77 21K 11

34 28 538 13K 25

View Details

Tate Clips @TheTateClips

24 hours ago

😳Andrew Tate EXPOSES how rich people plan and fund mass immigration in Britain and around the world. "...before you know it, you're living amongst this guy with a knife."

181 948 7K 343K 3K

View Details

Nicolas 🔺 @nicolas_a4

17 hours ago

@peter_szilagyi You're sheltering unauthorized open weight models, are you not?

2 7 117 3K 6

View Details

As believers of open research, we are disappointed to see Anthropic silently degrading Fable 5 for AI development "Any topic related to building pretraining pipelines, distributed training infrastructure, or ML accelerator design... may have limited effectiveness through Claude via methods such as prompt modification, steering vectors, or parameter-efficient fine-tuning." Not only do they get to decide what you use LLMs for in research, but this also enables them to silently intervene in your research without you knowing. This sets a dangerous precedent. If a model refuses openly, users can understand the boundary. If a model falls back to another model, users can still evaluate the difference. But if a model silently modifies or weakens its own answers while still pretending to help, researchers lose the ability to know whether a failed result came from their own idea, their implementation, or an invisible intervention by the model provider. That is not safety. Safety policies should be transparent, auditable, and user-visible. On top of that, the people most harmed by this are not the largest labs with massive teams and proprietary infrastructure. It is the independent researchers, academic groups, startups, and open-source builders who rely on public tools to compete, innovate, and pioneer AI for everyone else.