Mac @mac_eth

Founder @AskSurplus - the spot market for AI inference. surplusintelligence.ai nyc & sf Joined June 2022

Tweets

1K
Followers

4K
Following

3K
Likes

12K

Mac @mac_eth

4 hours ago

For everyone getting rate limited by Anthropic...

psychonautica @life_with_be

7 hours ago

@kr0der Use @AskSurplus

0 0 4 2K 0

3 1 17 2K 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

4 hours ago

@PrehensileThumb Needs to make sense to the users though. eg why would sellers want to give even lower prices to stakers? What are you thinking by surplus performance bond? Might be interesting...

1 0 3 57 0

View Details

Have been having a lot of discussions about the disconnect between business outcomes and the outcomes for the token. I want to resolve that disconnect, but it's hard to find an ideal solution. Curious what people have in mind. A few options are: * token buys based on business performance * exploring conversion from tokens to equity Open to any ideas that are aligned with the long term success of this project.

27 5 57 8K 7

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@muststoprugs This would probably require selling the token to pay the Inference seller in their preferred currency.

2 0 1 42 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@muststoprugs How would we get higher limits from the sellers, ... from the inference sellers? And why would the inference sellers want to offer that based on the buyer's stake instead of based on how much the buyer pays to the seller?

0 0 1 32 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@muststoprugs Why would sellers want to provide that based on what the buyer is staking, instead of based on what the buyer is paying the seller?

2 0 1 23 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@muststoprugs Why would buyers want to see sellers with more stake vs the current model where buyers get the best price?

1 0 1 29 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@muststoprugs This seems easy to misuse E.g. What if sellers with high failure rates stake, and ones with low failure rates don't?

1 0 1 25 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@nickreames Can't do Venice tokenomics without minting & afaik we can't mint.

0 0 1 56 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@PrehensileThumb What integrations do you think the users would love?

1 0 1 96 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@DecampTheUsa "right of first refusal on new listings"? Why would stakers want to refuse a new listing on surplus?

1 0 1 92 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@0xTrenchSamurai How would you balance using fees for buys from fees vs other business costs?

0 0 1 98 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

5 hours ago

@SkyhighAlts How would the new token be connected to business outcomes though?

0 0 1 29 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

8 hours ago

@Substreight What design would you go with?

0 0 1 54 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

8 hours ago

@Substreight If any token/contract was possible, what would you suggest?

1 0 1 152 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

9 hours ago

@Tien_Nguyen369 Yeah I agree with having it phase in above $50k MRR or at least above our business burn rate.

0 0 2 63 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

11 hours ago

@specmacs @paoloanzn @freecodexyz thanks, bookmerked

0 0 3 145 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

11 hours ago

Hard to do when we don't control the token supply, design, holders... We only get the fees. For example, minting to sellers and burning from buyers would be a cool mechanic but impossible to implement because we don't control minting. Open to ideas that would work given the constraints.

4 0 1 332 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

11 hours ago

@kardinall We were the #2 bankr project last I checked so it's pretty much up to us and Gitlawb to pioneer what success looks like for this.

2 1 1 583 0

View Details

Mac @mac_eth

11 hours ago

@Tien_Nguyen369 Yeah, what kind of business performance/health metrics would you use? I have my own thoughts but am curious how the community is thinking