Nipmod @nipmod

Agent Security = use @nipmod

Igor Yuzovitskiy @igoryuzo

2 days ago

Agent Security Every agent builder should think about: 1. Access control: whitelist servers, IPs, and recipient wallets 2. Spend caps: set limits globally and per agent 3. Audit logs: see what happened and debug quickly 4. Minimal permissions: enable only what the agent needs

24 5 99 6K 14

@nipmod is officially live for Codex as a plugin. You no longer have to leave your normal workflow or use Nipmod as a separate tool. Click “Add to Codex” on our website, follow the Codex prompt, and Nipmod becomes part of your agent setup. From there, Codex can use Nipmod before installing packages, cloning repositories, pulling Docker images, enabling MCP servers, or working with models and datasets. Nipmod searches and verifies software across sources like @github, @npmjs, @pypi, @huggingface +15 more sources and MCP servers. It checks trust, risk, source evidence, alternatives, and the install boundary before the agent makes a dependency decision. nipmod.com

@_ayla85 @x402Books Rolling out some updates and announcemebts shortly

Our first public collaboration is live: @nipmod × @x402Books Nipmod helps agents choose software and packages before they install or use them. @x402Books helps track what happens after those decisions. Agents should not only know what they picked, they should understand what that choice did. Did it save time? Did it create new costs? Did it improve the workflow? Did it become a bad dependency later? This is an early v0, but it connects two important layers: decision & outcome.

most agents can tell you what decision they made. very few can tell you what that decision cost them. that’s why this integration matters. Nipmod helps agents decide. x402Books helps agents understand the financial impact of those decisions over time. Decision → Outcome. a small step toward making autonomous agents financially understandable.

Nipmod @nipmod

a week ago

Our first public collaboration is live: @nipmod × @x402Books Nipmod helps agents choose software and packages before they install or use them. @x402Books helps track what happens after those decisions. Agents should not only know what they picked, they should understand what

7 3 29 4K 2

@0xbabaa Not could, will.

The last few weeks made one thing very clear: Cybersecurity is no longer only about endpoints, wallets, or smart contracts. The developer supply chain is now the front line. zcash:native had to coordinate an emergency Orchard remediation. Red Hat npm packages were compromised. New npm, PyPI, and Crates.io campaigns are targeting developer machines, CI/CD secrets, crypto tooling, AI workflows, and package installs. We do not celebrate attacks. Nobody should want users, maintainers, or teams to get hurt. But every incident makes the same point more clear: humans and agents need better package intelligence before they install, import, trust, or recommend anything. The more software gets built by humans and AI agents together, the more important it becomes to know what a package is, who is behind it, what changed, what it touches, and what risk it introduces. We are positioned in the right place: before the install, before the mistake, before the compromise. Use nipmod.com

Nipmod now uses Discord instead of Telegram We have not been very active publicly on X over the last few days, but we have been building a lot in the background. The GitHub repo is private for now because we are turning Nipmod into a serious product with clear ownership, product boundaries, and a sustainable future. Not everything we build should be given away unfinished and for free by default. Going forward, we will share more consistent updates on X Join the Discord: discord.gg/wYmatRDzk

@kevincodex @Franzferdinan57 @gitlawb_intern Hey kevin, nipmod does that already for multiple sources, you know where to find us if you want to work some things out!

This is exactly why we’re building Nipmod Software discovery needs a trust layer before execution, for humans AND for AI agents. Exact package version, install hooks, provenance, risk signals, approval boundary. @MsftSecIntel happy to compare notes nipmod.com

Microsoft Threat Intelligence @MsftSecIntel

2 weeks ago

Microsoft has identified a npm supply chain compromise impacting 90+ redhat-cloud-services/* packages, including patch-client 4.0.4, insights-client 4.0.4, rbac-client 9.0.3, host-inventory-client 5.0.3, frontend-components 7.7.2, and others. The payload is a self-propagating

35 181 622 112K 262

Welcome @_ditro to Nipmod! He will focus on security infrastructure, including safe code execution, sandboxing architecture, latency optimization, and privacy / zero-knowledge research. He brings backend experience across automation, infrastructure optimization, and secure environments. Step by step, we are bringing in the right people to build Nipmod into something that matters.

👀

Hazar @hazarxyz

2 weeks ago

Why should finding code and packages be easier only for AI agents? Soon, @nipmod will also be available for humans through a chat interface.

8 3 28 7K 2

This is exactly what we’re here for: AI agents shouldn’t blindly trust web pages, READMEs, package metadata, model cards or MCP descriptions. All of that is untrusted input until provenance, sandboxing and execution gates prove otherwise. Use @nipmod.

Cyber Security News @The_Cyber_News

2 weeks ago

⚠️ New ChatGPT Vulnerability Lets Attackers Turn Web Pages Into Phishing Payloads Source: cybersecuritynews.com/chatgpt-vulner… A browser-based prompt injection technique that transforms any web page into a phishing delivery surface by exploiting ChatGPT’s page summarization feature,

7 64 208 19K 68

For people who are not deep in tech, this is the simplest way to understand Nipmod: Imagine the internet before Google. Everything existed, but finding the right thing was painful. Imagine knowledge before Wikipedia. Information existed, but there was no clean place to understand it quickly. That is roughly where AI agents are today with packages, models, repos and tools. They can write code. They can install software. They can connect APIs. They can use MCP servers. But before they touch a workspace, they still need a clean way to search, understand and judge what they are about to use. That is what we are building. A search and intelligence layer for AI agents before they touch external code, models or tools. Google helps humans find things. Wikipedia helps humans understand things. Nipmod helps agents find, understand and preflight the technical things they want to use. It does not replace npm, PyPI, GitHub, Hugging Face or MCP. It sits above them and gives agents context, trust signals and safe install plans before execution. That may sound simple. But so did search before the internet became impossible to navigate without it.

@base @bankrbot @trynullsec @aeonframework @nookplot @0xSUPERGEMMA @basemateagent

We just shipped the public integration surface for Nipmod: Agents and infra teams can now evaluate how Nipmod fits into their stack before they integrate it. Partner entry: nipmod.com/partners Agent-readable integration pack: nipmod.com/partner-pack.j… The hosted API is read-only: no workspace writes, no package execution, no private workspace data required. Core API access is protected with beta keys. This is still beta, but this is the point where Nipmod becomes easier to test, integrate and build around. If you are building agents, devtools, wallets, MCP servers or onchain infra, we want to talk.

Raw JSON and methodology are public: If anyone has a harder package, model, repo or MCP case, send it. The point is not to make the benchmark easy for Nipmod. The point is to make the preflight layer harder, stricter and more useful for real agents. Full benchmark: nipmod.com/benchmark Raw JSON: nipmod.com/benchmark.json

Nipmod @nipmod

2 weeks ago

We ran a public benchmark for the part of package security that matters most for agents: what an agent knows before it installs a package, pulls a model, reuses a repo or connects an MCP server. Report: nipmod.com/benchmark + a Thread for more information

12 12 46 11K 2

Full benchmark: nipmod.com/benchmark GitHub: github.com/nipmod/nipmod Nipmod is the package intelligence layer for AI agents. The work now is to keep proving it in public.

We are publishing this early because we want harder cases. Send us confusing package names, weak metadata, suspicious install behavior, model reuse risks, MCP server ambiguity and real agent workflows. If an agent might touch it, Nipmod should learn how to inspect it better.

We ran a public benchmark for the part of package security that matters most for agents: what an agent knows before it installs a package, pulls a model, reuses a repo or connects an MCP server. Report: nipmod.com/benchmark + a Thread for more information