RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

rspec.info Joined April 2009

Tweets

275
Followers

2K
Following

1K
Likes

0

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

2 years ago

Announcing the Monorepo. We’re switching to a monorepo out of the rspec/rspec repository on Github, for the full story: rspec.info/blog/2024/11/i…

0 1 2 2K 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

Rails 6.0.4 contains some of these bug fixes for your convenience [but does not officially support 7.1] and is the last 6.0.x release. For all the changes see: github.com/rspec/rspec-ra…

0 0 0 263 0

View Details

Hi! We've just released `rspec-rails` 6.1.0 with some enhancements and fixes for Rails 7.1! 🎉 As per `rspec-rails` versioning this release supports Rails 6.1, 7.0, and 7.1 and is now our maintained release stream, it contains no breaking changes [that we know of] so good to go!

1 2 7 3K 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

@sudhindraRao You probably need to access via https, I think twitter just added http by default, it’s GitHub pages underneath so has a let’s encrypt cert

1 0 0 77 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

@RogersKonnor @mhenrixon @Benoit_Tgt We’ve fixed the drop-down, probably will ship some more mobile layout tweaks later

0 0 2 19 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

Good news everyone! We've replaced Relish with our own self hosted documentation, see: rspec.info/documentation/ to link through to each libraries examples.

2 36 96 11K 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

@mhenrixon We’ve fixed the drop-down, probably will ship some more mobile layout tweaks later

1 0 2 82 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

@mhenrixon Thank you for testing this, the drop downs don’t work on mobile safari, will fix! The rspec.info link worked from here but the relishapp link is a 404 (which is why we are replacing it) are you seeing a 404 from rspec.info?

0 0 1 57 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

These are somewhat url compatible with the old relish docs so if search takes you to: relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-ex…… You can change this to: rspec.info/features/3-12/…… And get the same page. Feedback welcome!

0 1 5 670 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

Hey everyone still here, if you feel like you need a non bird site place to follow RSpec, we also have an account on (at rspec at) ruby.social please follow us there also as its easier to update with apps (we're Ivory fans).

0 0 2 285 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

3 years ago

Hi everyone, we know RelishApp is down, its unfortunately out of our hands to do anything about it, see Matt's post for some context: write.as/mattwynne/reli… You can find the cucumber scenarios and readmes in the repos still and we're looking at alternatives.

1 10 19 2K 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

4 years ago

@GhostBrain The logo can be considered CC NC SA if that helps, I’ll update the repo at some point soon.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

4 years ago

@GhostBrain That’s a good question…

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

4 years ago

@fbeausoleil You can create aliases in your shell itself.,e.g. I have in my `~/.profile`: ``` alias rr='git ls-files -mo --exclude-standard | exists | grep _spec\.rb$ | xargs bundle exec rspec' alias ro='bundler exec rspec --only-failures' alias rn='bundler exec rspec --next-failure' ```

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

Is your test suite slow on CI? Take a sneaky peek at how @buildkite founder @keithpitt made some of his RSpec tests faster using their new Test Analytics!

Keith Pitt @keithpitt

5 years ago

Now that we’ve told you about @buildkite Test Analytics, I can start showing you some sneaky screenshots of the product. Am I allowed to do this? I’m not sure…I haven’t actually asked anyone. But it’s Friday afternoon, and I’m pretty sure everyone’s gone home 😎 (1/12) 🧵

8 16 66 0 5

0 0 11 0 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

@onghu @PCurell @ruby_rails_bot # RecordFileOutput.run(:global, "") # running exe # => 2021-08-18 08:27:00.866983 +0100 # RecordFileOutput.run(:global, "") # => 2021-08-18 08:27:00.866983 +0100 # RecordFileOutput.run(:specific, "") # running exe # => 2021-08-18 08:27:07.200896 +0100

0 0 1 0 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

@onghu @PCurell @ruby_rails_bot e.g. module RecordFileOutput module_function def run(name, config) @outputs ||= {} @outputs[name] || @outputs[name] = call_exec(config) end def call_exec(config) puts "running exe" Time.now end end

0 0 1 0 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

@onghu @PCurell @ruby_rails_bot If you isolate the code into a module function thats memoised, you can call it safely at any point and it would only run once, to allow different config to run you could then use “names” to distinguish different memoised outputs.

1 0 1 0 1

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

@knowuh @V8 No it’s the standard Ruby `did_you_mean` suggestion caused by a `NameError` and you happen to.. er.. have a to_v8 method defined somewhere. Did you put `expect(…).to_have(…)` when you meant `expect(…).to have(..)` somewhere?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

RSpec - BDD for Ruby @rspec

5 years ago

@realntl @waiting_for_dev @_solnic_ @tom_dalling Also, and I’ll add this disclaimer, I love seeing new testing frameworks trying new things, just because RSpec does something one way doesn’t mean I’m not a fan of other ways. I also use ExUnit a lot and I could do a whole series of tweets on a comparison with RSpec 😂