state @statelayer

Joined April 2020

Tweets

16
Followers

49K
Following

1K
Likes

25K

Ethereum Foundation @ethereumfndn

2 months ago

0/ Today, the Ethereum Foundation completed a bilateral swap of ~21,269 aWETH to wstETH, coordinated with @LidoFinance and @mellowprotocol as part of their ongoing deleveraging work.

37 53 432 154K 24

View Details

state @statelayer

2 months ago

North Korea comprimised multiple of their RPCs but then we are supposed to believe multiple DVNs somehow makes things 10000% safe

LayerZero @LayerZero_Core

2 months ago

x.com/i/article/2046…

375 469 2K 2.0M 829

7 1 26 2K 0

View Details

state @statelayer

10 months ago

@smyyguy @crypto_condom ty

0 0 4 172 0

View Details

state @statelayer

10 months ago

@smyyguy @crypto_condom think mstr uses diluted for mnav right?

1 0 2 186 0

View Details

state @statelayer

10 months ago

@smyyguy @crypto_condom bmnr said 221 x.com/BitMNR/status/…

Bitmine (NYSE-BMNR) $ETH @BitMNR

10 months ago

2/5 BitMine's Crypto NAV (net asset value) is $39.84 per $BMNR share: - ETH $8.24 billion (1.7mm $ETH tokens) - BTC $22 million (192 $BTC coins) - treasury cash (unencumbered) $562 million = NAV $8.82 billion - fully diluted shares outstanding 221,515,180 = NAV per

25 48 394 321K 70

1 0 1 222 0

View Details

state @statelayer

10 months ago

can Tom Lee do something

86 1 52 5K 5

View Details

state @statelayer

10 months ago

@hasufl but you're increasing the earnings per LDO which are in ETH

1 0 0 450 0

View Details

state @statelayer

11 months ago

@hasufl headline a bit misleading PR just says they approved a program for when it would be better, doesn't seem like they'll do it asap

2 0 3 1K 0

View Details

state @statelayer

11 months ago

When your ETH beta alts aren't going up with ETH

15 4 134 10K 3

View Details

state @statelayer

a year ago

@HadickM You're right, found it

0 0 2 150 0

View Details

state @statelayer

a year ago

@HadickM wow okay i thought it had an expiry, where did you see that, their s1?

1 0 1 106 0

View Details

state @statelayer

a year ago

@hasufl 100% agree, there is zero reason for a 20B+ AUM CEX to be blind signing transactions coming from a website for their cold wallets instead of having a institutional grade fully offline custody setup

1 0 10 611 0

View Details

Hasu⚡️🤖 @hasufl

a year ago

This is a tricky thing to answer (and not because I'm investor in Safe - my stake is tiny and I couldn't care less about it relative to my reputation) For Safes and other smart wallets to be useful, the ability to make secure signatures must exist as a complement. Safe provides one such possibility through the centralized front end, but it should never be relied on exclusively. I would blame Safe most for not working more with the largest and most at-risk Safe users to educate them on secure signing practices to ensure secure signing is abundant. Secondarily, I would blame Safe for getting compromised, and I hope we eventually learn how that happened exactly. But the reality is that 1) independent message verification for Bybit is easy and prevents almost every hack 2) perpetually preventing a frontend from becoming compromised is comparatively much harder 3) drawing attention to 2) instead of 1) prevents people from learning the right lesson, which is to adopt secure signing practices and stop trusting frontends

6 8 68 8K 4

View Details

Tom Howard @_TomHoward

a year ago

@safe Since it is not clear in @safe’s update: The front end served by SAFE from safe.global was fully compromised and could have affected any users from that front end, however only Bybit was attacked.