Dr Internet User @webfunction

DM for Signal info Joined April 2021

Tweets

27
Followers

54
Following

312
Likes

68

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@suehalpernVT Please contact me, thank you

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@o_saja @zephoria @katecrawford @zeynep I believe Crawford's own history of erasure is relevant here

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

@jilltxt @katecrawford @AlexCampolo @LFeldmanBarrett @luke_stark @elizwilsonemory To be extra clear: Stark is not cited in the book’s affect recognition chapter, which was the subject of the tweets. Thank you for helping clarify.

0 0 0 0 1

View Details

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@jilltxt @katecrawford @AlexCampolo @LFeldmanBarrett @luke_stark @elizwilsonemory I also compared the book's footnotes to the article's hyperlinks. The most significant cut: in the Atlantic Magazine version, where the greatest number of people would see it, Crawford removed credit for her subordinate Alex Campolo.

1 0 0 0 1

View Details

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@_jenlowe_ @datasociety @katecrawford I've been doing significant research on Crawford's plagiarism and misrepresentations. Please contact me.

0 5 26 0 5

View Details

Dr. Jen Schradie - @schradie.bsky.social @schradie

5 years ago

@_jenlowe_

0 2 10 0 2

View Details

Dr. Sarah T. Roberts [email protected] @ubiquity75

5 years ago

Academia and its proxies do not have to be instruments of structural oppression and institutionally-sanctioned abuse. But that means actively dismantling it as it is now. Because the status quo is predicated on it.

6 31 175 0 14

View Details

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@mer__edith @landay

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@_jenlowe_ @datasociety @katecrawford I've been doing significant research on Crawford's plagiarism and misrepresentations. Please contact me.

0 5 26 0 5

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Meredith Whittaker @mer__edith

5 years ago

Jen, thank you and solidarity. You're not alone. For the last years AI Now -- the team, myself and other leadership -- struggled to remove Kate and Jason Schultz from the organization and to recover from the toxic pattern of extraction and harm.

7 42 246 0 53

View Details

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@leonieclaude @theodorajewell

Dr Internet User @webfunction

5 years ago

@_jenlowe_ @datasociety @katecrawford I've been doing significant research on Crawford's plagiarism and misrepresentations. Please contact me.

0 5 26 0 5

0 0 3 0 0

View Details

Dr. Casey Fiesler is no longer on here @cfiesler

5 years ago

So there's incentive issue #3: Whose job is it to uncover scientific fraud? Not only is it a lot of work that you might not get credit for in the traditional incentive structures of academia, but it might be a legitimate career jeopardizing risk.

1 7 27 0 0

View Details

Dr. Casey Fiesler is no longer on here @cfiesler

5 years ago

Another suggestion for what academia should learn from that kind of scandal is more candor about the potential for falsified data. I truly believe that the vast majority of scientists have individual integrity and that science can be trusted. But we still have to recognize this.

1 4 17 0 0

View Details

Dr. Casey Fiesler is no longer on here @cfiesler

5 years ago

Data from a Dan Ariely study about honesty turns out to be fabricated. This is another example of how much science relies on individual integrity... and how incentive structures in academia can push against that. Remember the fabricated gay marriage data scandal of 2014? [Thread]

Stephanie M. Lee @stephaniemlee

5 years ago

NEW: A big study about honesty—led by Dan Ariely, who literally wrote the book on the subject—is being retracted over fake data. What does Dr. Ariely have to say? And what's the company that allegedly provided the data? I have answers. buzzfeednews.com/article/stepha…

44 297 881 0 171

5 48 174 0 23

View Details

Emily Saltz @saltzshaker

5 years ago

@michaellyons @VanessaBartlett @luke_stark @katecrawford @GabbyJTB @SpreadboroughKL @CAIDE_UoM @UniMelb @ArtsUnimelb @PartnershipAI @CLeibowicz @Lialialiacole Thanks so much for the kind words! And @michaellyons your paper on "Excavating 'Excavating AI;" also adds important nuance for artists commenting on ethics – we've actually cited it in subsequent presentations/forthcoming work :) arxiv.org/abs/2009.01215

0 2 4 0 1

View Details

arXiv Daily @Arxiv_Daily

5 years ago

"Excavating AI" Re-excavated: Debunking a Fallacious Account of the JAFFE Dataset deepai.org/publication/ex… by Michael J. Lyons #MachineLearning #ComputerScience

0 4 7 0 0

View Details

Dr. Ethel Mickey @EthelMickey

5 years ago

@rhacel Women faculty of color experience academic theft more than I ever realized. It's in our interview data. We find it's even worse for foreign-born WOC. We're writing a piece on predatory collaborations (cc @JoyaMisra). I am so sorry.